- 450
- 11
as in a being who has never been created and always existed in a void for eternity...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Beerus, being eternal has absolutely no bearing on dimensionalityPromestein said:Could be anything. Means nothing on its own.
Go look up Monarch of Pointland. He's 11-C. The lowest tier, and he's eternal.Beerus1000 said:no i mean what if a being is void itself?since pure void has always existed and it has never been created or destroyed.so what dimension would this be ,if a being were to be this void itself
but monarch of pointland has durability.it's not really void.Vizorus69 said:Go look up Monarch of Pointland. He's 11-C. The lowest tier, and he's eternal.Beerus1000 said:no i mean what if a being is void itself?since pure void has always existed and it has never been created or destroyed.so what dimension would this be ,if a being were to be this void itself
A lack of non-existenceBeerus1000 said:a true void being cannot have durability.or else they are not true void.for example if a tier 1a character were to destroy a void.what would exist then?tell me
exactly my point.another definition for void is not valid which has pretty much the same meaning as non existence.this is what i am getting at guys.so a being that has been this void before everything or anything existed?wouldn' it be above everything or pretty much above everything?Yobobojojo said:A lack of non-existenceBeerus1000 said:a true void being cannot have durability.or else they are not true void.for example if a tier 1a character were to destroy a void.what would exist then?tell me
this isn't really from a verse lolYobobojojo said:Context from the verse is needed. It could be high. Could be nothing.
this isn't from a verse.i am thinking of how powerful would a being like this be if this being existed.Akreious said:If they're literally of the Void (AKA Nothing/Transcends concepts) then it's 1-A easily. However if they're shown to be less than Literally The Void then it could mean anything depending on the context from the verse the feat is displayed in.
We have no way of knowing.Beerus1000 said:so what if we have beings that live in non existence in our reality.how powerful would they be?
would they be above 5 dimensional space at least?Promestein said:We have no way of knowing.Beerus1000 said:so what if we have beings that live in non existence in our reality.how powerful would they be?
Depends on your definition of eternal. If it's eternal as if beyond time, then yes, 5D and above, but if it is eternal as in beyond constraints, than it's Outerverse level.Beerus1000 said:yeah i know dimensions don't work in real life like how they do on this website.but according to this website, would a being like this be 5d or above ?
i don't quite get it though,like what makes someone 5d?is it being able to create a universe with its own space time continumm or what?i mean i have an idea what 5d is but i don't completely get it like you guysVizorus69 said:Depends on your definition of eternal. If it's eternal as if beyond time, then yes, 5D and above, but if it is eternal as in beyond constraints, than it's Outerverse level.Beerus1000 said:yeah i know dimensions don't work in real life like how they do on this website.but according to this website, would a being like this be 5d or above ?
Uhh, how? How does one become 5-D for just having multiple timelines?Vizorus69 said:Actually, multiple timelines could mean 5D.
Wah? A parallel universe isnt 4-D, why should a different timeline?Vizorus69 said:Well, if time is 4-D, wouldn't that mean that alternate timelines is 5-D?
because a different timelines would be in a different dimensional space than the timeline that is 4d.so by this logic it is 5dFirst Witch said:Wah? A parallel universe isnt 4-D, why should a different timeline?Vizorus69 said:Well, if time is 4-D, wouldn't that mean that alternate timelines is 5-D?
thats not how it works.let me give you an example if you are able to destroy one 4d universes.then you are operating in a dimensional space that will reach only this 4d universe but if you are able to destroy two 4d universes at the same time you are operating in a different dimensional space to be able to destroy two universes at the same time.this is why it could be 5d. and if someone can already destroy two 4d universes.he is already operating at a lv where he could destroy an infinite amount of universes.the only reason he couldn't could be he lacks power. what i am trying to make you understand is for someone to destroy two 4d universes he would have to operate in a different dimensional space to do that.Assaltwaffle said:No, that isn't how it works. Being in different dimensional space does not make it a layer above. You can have infinite 4-D timelines; that doesn't make them have infinite dimensions.
how if infinite 5d space high 2a? i thought 5D alone was high 2ACrzer07 said:infinite 1-D space is 11-B, infinite 2-D space is 11-A, infinite 3-D space is High 3-A, infinite 4-D space is 2-A, infinite 5-D space is At least High 2-A, infinite 6-D space is Low 1-C, and so on
3-D: Tier 10-3
4-D: Tier 2
5-D: High 2-A
Universe: 3-4-dimensional
Multiverse: 4-5-dimensional
this is cosmology and metaphysics 101