Void questions.

[Orange]

Is this void manipulation?:
Creating a void.
Creating something after being erased.
Restoring something after being erased.

 

[Hasty12345]

1 yes, if it’s literal.
2 and 3 I’m not sure, if a character is erased idk if their actions (such as creation) are naturally considered void manip, that’s an interesting question

 

[Orange]

1- yes. Let's say the void is literally described as such, would it still ckint as void manipulation?
2-3 well I'll give a small context. Let's say, that the EE that erased such objects is good enough to Erase even void itself. and let's say, someone else recreated such structure. Is it still void manipulation?

 

[Hasty12345]

1- yes. Let's say the void is literally described as such, would it still ckint as void manipulation?
2-3 well I'll give a small context. Let's say, that the EE that erased such objects is good enough to Erase even void itself. and let's say, someone else recreated such structure. Is it still void manipulation?

I’d say yes, that sounds like textbook definition to the best of my knowledge.

 

[Orange]

I’d say yes, that sounds like textbook definition to the best of my knowledge.

Oh well, thanks.
For some reason I thought recreating/restoring something From EE that can even voids, would be above baseline void manipulation or something

 

[Hasty12345]

Oh well, thanks.
For some reason I thought recreating/restoring something From EE that can even voids, would be above baseline void manipulation or something

Idk about “above baseline void manipulation” would be unless it’s apart if a universal energy system or something.

that being said, this also sounds like it could grant NPI of some kind as well

 

[Orange]

Idk about “above baseline void manipulation” would be unless it’s apart if a universal energy system or something.

that being said, this also sounds like it could grant NPI of some kind as well

Oooo I see I see. Thank you. I'll wait for more opinions