Verse Equalization Minor Wording Change

[Bernkastelll]

If the "verse-enemy" character covers all the requeriments to possesses "vital energy", then yes, it possesses "vital energy".

But what about the other verse that doesnt have vital energy? Why would it have vital energy in equalization?

 

[Antoniofer]

Cuz it covered all the requisites of the other verse in order to have "vital energy". For example, if vital energy is the force that flow through living beings, mountains, rivers and all natural elements then the character from the other verse have it al well if its a living being or made of some natural element; if the character is instead an undead or its ammortal then it wouldn't fulfll the requeriments, and thus it can be assumed that it doesn't not possesses "vital energy".

 

[Bernkastelll]

Cuz it covered all the requisites of the other verse in order to have "vital energy". For example, if vital energy is the force that flow through living beings, mountains, rivers and all natural elements then the character from the other verse have it al well if its a living being or made of some natural element; if the character is instead an undead or its ammortal then it wouldn't fulfll the requeriments, and thus it can be assumed that it doesn't not possesses "vital energy".

But im talking about a verse that stated that vital energy does not exist, it would start to exist just due verse equalization?

 

[Antoniofer]

If verse 1 vital energy = verse 2 vital energy, then yes; but both powers charing the same name may be a coincidence, they could very well work mechanically different; and thus, we not qualify powers by name.

 

[Bernkastelll]

If verse 1 vital energy = verse 2 vital energy, then yes;

But im talking about a verse that is stated to have no vital energy

 

[Antoniofer]

... Not sure how expand more into this subject.

Plus, its kind of contradictory for the verse stating that this specific kind of energy doesn't exist, as doing that it already acknowledge its existance. The example of your is never going to happen.

 

[Antvasima]

So should we apply Axxtentacle's modified text then?

 

[AKM sama]

So should we apply Axxtentacle's modified text then?

Since the staff members were in agreement with the idea and DT was fine with Axx's text, I applied it.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you. Is there anything left to do here, or should we close this thread?

 

[UchihaSlayer96]

It should probably be closed since the changes were applied.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.