Unbreakable grants Invulnerability via negating the concept of breaking. With that said, after checking the Powers and Abilities page I narrowed down it down to Durability Negation and Deconstruction, and I chose to go with the Deconstruction since it's the one that's literally about breaking things down to smaller pieces, therefore being the closest one to the concept of breaking.
i don't know damage?
I am well-aware of that but like I said it was the closest option I could think of since there is no other ability listed that's about breaking things down.
Invulnerability is already listed in her profile so there's no issues there., The thing is though Invulnerability is simply the effect that her ability grants not the ability itself. Her character bio clearly states that her ability is "imbuing what she creates with a power that negates breaking" so I'd say this is the closest fit.
I know how negation abilities work and why they are often formatted as eg. "Negation of the Rule(law manip) of Death(death manip)". Unbreakable would be indexed on this wiki as Invulnerability via Law Manip and Concept Manip. Because there is no breaking page. It is what it is.
So do you think Durability Negation would be a better fit then? Cause it is said in the Invulnerability page that it's the polar opposite of it
The rules that the Uma's govern over are shown to encompass everything related to. With that said, wouldn't the rule of "breaking" also include Deconstruction as well?
Decon isn't about pure breaking. It's about deconstructing the material through special means.
I'm aware of what the Deconstruction page said. What I'm saying is that the Negator's powers are shown to be the polar opposite of their Rules, and so that would mean that the power of the Uma that governs over the concept of breaking would most likely be Deconstruction to reflect that.
The extent of this ability can vary from user to user. Some can only break down physical things like matter while others can interact with metaphysical objects like the soul. It differs from traditional Matter Manipulation or other abilities like them by only allowing the user to break things down, not manipulate them. Deconstruction users cannot manipulate things they've already broken down to the fullest extent of their ability.
Again Deconstruction is for breaking down matter in a specific way, Unbreakable is about making something unbreakable, nothing else. Your two examples are irrelevant here as they decon in a specific way, they aren’t just decon by alchemy and magic they are:
This logic doesn’t make sense. Unbreaking and deconstructing aren’t opposites on the site or in real life. Unbreaking is a broad concept meant for things that don’t break, deconstruction is meant usually to indicate something is having its parts separated in a specific way or the whole is being separated to give a specific affect. So while both use the word breaking, they are being meant differently.
