• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Umineko question

Status
Not open for further replies.
3,566
879
I heard that Umineko characters are rated as low 1-C, 1-B, 1-A,.... Because each higher world is infinitely above the lower worlds however in the manga and novels we see them treating higher dimensional worlds like the Meta world as an alternate world instead of it being a higher dimensional world :

7952384-img_20210507_094151.jpg


7951365-screenshot2021-05-06200103.png



My question is........ Why?
 
Last edited:
Others stuff confirm it being a higher world. Chess analogy or TRIanthology intro are one among many.
Also this part actually make it depict higher D stuff pretty well.
 
The dimensions, worlds, and domains are explicitly higher (or whatever you want to call them), having a reality-fiction difference between them most of the time.

For those scans above specifically, the translation is kinda wrong. From the RAW is more like "They are in a different world from this one. A world made of parallel lines that are close but never intersect".
 
The dimensions, worlds, and domains are explicitly higher (or whatever you want to call them), having a reality-fiction difference between them most of the time.

For those scans above specifically, the translation is kinda wrong. From the RAW is more like "They are in a different world from this one. A world made of parallel lines that are close but never intersect".
Ummmmm can you give me the Japanese version of this quote? It would be very appreciated
 
The dimensions, worlds, and domains are explicitly higher (or whatever you want to call them), having a reality-fiction difference between them most of the time.

For those scans above specifically, the translation is kinda wrong. From the RAW is more like "They are in a different world from this one. A world made of parallel lines that are close but never intersect".
Likely referring to the ladder analogy used in the VN.
 
Also this, dimensions in Umineko are higher dimensional, yeah, something that its infinite on a lower dimension is literally ''Nothing'', it doesnt even exist on a higher dimension

7867264-2809535721-639.p.png
 
The translation says :

"A world of parallel lines that are very close but never intersect..."

Isn't this the same thing as alternate world?
The VN explicitly uses a ladder analogy, if you turn vertical parallel lines sideways (like the VN describes) you end up with a hierarchy.

not to mention there’s infinite steps, the distance between them being small likely references the density of the parallel lines, not the power gaps between them.
 
Like...I don't hate Umineko or anything but "A world of parallel lines that are very close but never intersect" isn't really the most meaningful of statements and the official translation can probably be trusted to translate it properly in the given context.

There is no need to make these extremely weird and unsupported interpretations of such a vague and meaningless statement that likely isn't even being translated correctly by the machine translators. We know the meta world is a higher world and a single Anti Feat won't disprove it.
 
Like...I don't hate Umineko or anything but "A world of parallel lines that are very close but never intersect" isn't really the most meaningful of statements and the official translation can probably be trusted to translate it properly in the given context.

There is no need to make these extremely weird and unsupported interpretations of such a vague and meaningless statement that likely isn't even being translated correctly by the machine translators. We know the meta world is a higher world and a single Anti Feat won't disprove it.
Idk if you’re referring to my “weird and unsupported interpretations”, but if you read the Umineko explanation page, there’s approximately 100 scans which support the interpretations I provided.
 
Idk if you’re referring to my “weird and unsupported interpretations”, but if you read the Umineko explanation page, there’s approximately 100 scans which support the interpretations I provided.
I have read those pages and nothing there supports whatever fanfiction you were brewing up there.
 
Yeah personnaly my only problem with umineko is the 3rd domain as for me it should just kingdom of God>witch domain as it where is feath after she fall to rest in creator. I don't understand creating a entire Infinite layered domain (with only justification for being Infinite layered is "one journey to the creator has no endpoint") to tell that it's where Featherine have go when i'ts tell just after that Featherine is in kingdom of god that last layer before the creator (and that even lambda tell that ut exist only 3 domain, human one, witch one, and where reside creator one)
 
Not if the ladder is being used to metaphorically refer to a heirarchy.
so..... when we know ladder's are being used as analogies by the VN, this supports the notion the parallel lines are in reference to the steps on the metaphorical ladder.


Either there exists an interpretation that coincides with the source material, or it's flat out a contradiction (pending alternate meanings of the kanji ofc).
 
Yeah personnaly my only problem with umineko is the 3rd domain as for me it should just kingdom of God>witch domain as it where is feath after she fall to rest in creator. I don't understand creating a entire Infinite layered domain (with only justification for being Infinite layered is "one journey to the creator has no endpoint") to tell that it's where Featherine have go when i'ts tell just after that Featherine is in kingdom of god that last layer before the creator (and that even lambda tell that ut exist only 3 domain, human one, witch one, and where reside creator one)
Headcanons being sadly too stronk
 
He meant that they were parallel as one above the other, not parallel like universes.
That's still not how higher layers work. They encompass each other, there is absolutely no "parallel existence" possible for higher layers.


so..... when we know ladder's are being used as analogies by the VN, this supports the notion the parallel lines are in reference to the steps on the metaphorical ladder.
No it doesn't. The context was Beatrice explaining Battler's location to Eva beatrice, not how the meta world works.

Either there exists an interpretation that coincides with the source material, or it's flat out a contradiction (pending alternate meanings of the kanji ofc).
Or maybe we just don't need to take literally every sentence any verse uses at face value? This of course goes for both feats and anti feats. But sadly this wouldn't be vswiki if every statement ever wasn't exaggerated to its utmost limits.
 
That's still not how higher layers work. They encompass each other, there is absolutely no "parallel existence" possible for higher layers.
This is an example of taking an analogy too far.


Or maybe we just don't need to take literally every sentence any verse uses at face value?
I think this is the exact opposite of what I was doing. For better, or for worse.
 
This is an example of taking an analogy too far
You don't get to decide arbitrary boundaries on how analogies are to be interpreted. It's all fine if it allows you to exaggerate and wank but "too far" if it goes even slightly in the other direction.

I think this is the exact opposite of what I was doing. For better, or for worse.
Yes, I think we should take into account the fact that authors don't have PhD in philosophy and semantics and the context of the story matters more than some out of context statements.
 
You don't get to decide arbitrary boundaries on how analogies are to be interpreted. It's all fine if it allows you to exaggerate and wank but "too far" if it goes even slightly in the other direction.
I didn’t arbitrarily decide. I took an interpretation that was consistent with the source material as I proved.

At worst I connected dots where there were none, however, it wasn’t arbitrary. The VN clearly uses hierarchies and ladders/towers with some other WTC VN’s using steps, all I did was provide a coinciding interpretation to the potential contradictory statement.

And I don’t think I exaggerated anything that could be seen as “wank”?
 
I didn’t arbitrarily decide. I took an interpretation that was consistent with the source material as I proved.

At worst I connected dots where there were none, however, it wasn’t arbitrary. The VN clearly uses hierarchies and ladders/towers with some other WTC VN’s using steps, all I did was provide a coinciding interpretation to the potential contradictory statement.
Taking "parallel lines" to mean rungs on a metaphorical ladder that obviously has Absolutely nothing to do with how a physical ladder looks like is quite a reaching conclusion I would say.

And I don’t think I exaggerated anything that could be seen as “wank”?
Sorry if it came that way but that wasn't for you, just me ranting a bit on how we treat tier 1 verses in general
 
Taking "parallel lines" to mean rungs on a metaphorical ladder that obviously has Absolutely nothing to do with how a physical ladder looks like is quite a reaching conclusion I would say.
Except we know from the VN (source material) that’s how the cosmology at that point is intended to be visualised.

so most (if not all) cosmology statements should be interpreted within the framework of the already established cosmology.

I’d argue it would be reaching to consider the contradictory interpretation before any reasonable coinciding interpretation. In which case, the source material should take precedence anyway (unless there’s some other factor not being taken into account).
 
Except we know from the VN (source material) that’s how the cosmology at that point is intended to be visualised.
Yes the cosmology is intended to be visualised like that but that does not mean you are free to headcanon something to such absurd levels. "Parallel lines" have absolutely nothing to do with heirarchy of worlds encompassing each other on a metaphorical ladder.

so most (if not all) cosmology statements should be interpreted within the framework of the already established cosmology.
There is no general rule saying "All cosmology statements must follow and revolve around the ladder analogy". The ladder statements themselves are just a very very tiny and throwaway portion of the lengthy story that is Umineko.

I’d argue it would be reaching to consider the contradictory interpretation before any reasonable coinciding interpretation. In which case, the source material should take precedence anyway (unless there’s some other factor not being taken into account).
It's far more reaching to conclude absurd unreasonable interpretations that have absolutely nothing to do with the localised context of the story at that point and have 0 implications to be like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top