• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

TYBW Anime Cour 3 [Lille Edition]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lille seems fine, though for Nanao I'm still personally uncertain about the Shinken Hakkyōken having ratings since I'm uncertain if it would have the same results on anything that's not light. Is there a way to make it clear on the profile that the up to 5C only applies to light and light accessories like a weakness or something, or is there additional context I'm missing for it to just be 5C in general.

I know the blade says it can only be used against godly beings, but I feel like there could be a way to make the limitations clear, especially since the justifications for AP says it can redirect opponent attacks, which makes it look like it can reflect any attack and the durability stats that it managed to stop a really strong attack without clarifying it was built to stop attacks like those in general.

Basically, tldr I think the Shinken Hakkyōken formatting makes it look like it could stop regular 5C attacks and deal 5C damage to everyone. This could be a me issue tbh.
 
Lille seems fine, though for Nanao I'm still personally uncertain about the Shinken Hakkyōken having ratings since I'm uncertain if it would have the same results on anything that's not light. Is there a way to make it clear on the profile that the up to 5C only applies to light and light accessories like a weakness or something, or is there additional context I'm missing for it to just be 5C in general.

I know the blade says it can only be used against godly beings, but I feel like there could be a way to make the limitations clear, especially since the justifications for AP says it can redirect opponent attacks, which makes it look like it can reflect any attack and the durability stats that it managed to stop a really strong attack without clarifying it was built to stop attacks like those in general.

Basically, tldr I think the Shinken Hakkyōken formatting makes it look like it could stop regular 5C attacks and deal 5C damage to everyone. This could be a me issue tbh.
I can add a Varies to the front that says "AP depends on the reflected attack", but the up to 5-C is there because she reflected Trompete. The P&A section should cover what her reflection can do, no need to be redundant.
 
Shouldn't Lille have 4-A scaling? He should be logically stronger than Quilge and Askin after all...
Why is Lille stronger than Ayon absorbed Quilge? And Askin isnt even 4-A on wiki, we’ll have to wait until cour 4 to see if he gets that scaling.
 
Why is Lille stronger than Ayon absorbed Quilge? And Askin isnt even 4-A on wiki, we’ll have to wait until cour 4 to see if he gets that scaling.
Idk if we should wait. It's made blatanly clear askin was stronger than urahara. Why urahara needed to strengthen his strength using bankai just ti cintest with askin in brute force.
 
Idk if we should wait. It's made blatanly clear askin was stronger than urahara.
Yes, we should wait. The anime is the primary canon for the TYBW, and Askin’s scaling to Urahara hasn’t happened in the anime yet.

This is also derailing from the purpose of this thread, which is Lille and Nanao, so this discussion should end here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top