• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Solaris is way higher into 2-A than Bill is. Bill is baseline, Solaris is millions of times above that. Solaris can literally just suck Bill into a black hole and erase him from existence.
 
ShadowWarrior1999 said:
Solaris is way higher into 2-A than Bill is. Bill is baseline, Solaris is millions of times above that. Solaris can literally just suck Bill into a black hole and erase him from existence.
He's using Lavos, not Solaris.

Anyways, I've done this and Lavos stomped. Someone close this.
 
He changed it after seeing that comment, it was against Solaris before

Anyway Lavos stomps way worse than Solaris did according to that comment (Idk if it's true)
 
RKGenki said:
He changed it after seeing that comment, it was against Solaris before

Anyway Lavos stomps way worse than Solaris did according to that comment (Idk if it's true)
I didn't say Solaris stomped since Bill does have haxes that can help him, I just stated how Solaris would win.

Heck, Lavos vs Solaris was considered a haxstomp. So if Lavos stomps Solaris and Solaris beats Bill, yeah A>B>C logic but you see where I'm getting at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top