- 11,080
- 2,389
Don't you think?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Transduality type 2 seems a little paradoxical
- Thread starter Greatsage13th
- Start date
-
- Tags
- transduality
- 26,116
- 3,649
Not all dual systems have to be to a 1-A level. There can be a reality in fiction that is simply Low 2-C with no higher dimensions or anything beyond it, but still have it governed by duality.
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #3
No that's not what I meant. What I'm trying to say is if you were going tovharm anyone with transduality type 2, it's going to be hell for them. just to explain what I mean for example, If someone with transduality type 2 are immune to all things with the value 1 and 0 and a certain Person manages to have a value neutral to these values it would form another duality with another value within the dual system causing a paradox with another followed by another one and another one which spirals up to an inumerable amount of dualities.
Just to sum things up or make it simpler.
Just imagine that this is 1 and 0
Someone manages to create a value neutral these values which I'll label as X but then there is a value that opposes X which will be labeled as Y and causes a paradox which resets to 1 and 0.
Just to sum things up or make it simpler.
Just imagine that this is 1 and 0
Someone manages to create a value neutral these values which I'll label as X but then there is a value that opposes X which will be labeled as Y and causes a paradox which resets to 1 and 0.
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #4
What I'm trying to say is that there is no neutral value within the dual system which doesn't cause a paradox or doesn't have anything else that opposes it. There could only be one value that is neutral within that system as such is nigh-impossible to form
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #5
- 26,116
- 3,649
Not really, there are quiet a few cases where something is just outside of a duality system. The concept of something not having an opposite is not really all that extreme.
And, if you mean the Wukong one, I did answer. For future replies, I would also suggest that you gather your ideas and make one comment instead of making several tens of them, each jumping back and forth in subjects.
And, if you mean the Wukong one, I did answer. For future replies, I would also suggest that you gather your ideas and make one comment instead of making several tens of them, each jumping back and forth in subjects.
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #7
Im pretty sure the latest comment there hasn't been replied.
Also the concept of something not having an opposite is type 3 in general or being superior to duality
- 26,116
- 3,649
There is no reply after the one I left.
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #9
Oof didn't see that but I still don't agree that there are things that are outside duality are type 2 and are mostly type 3. But what I'm trying to say is that there could only one neutral value inside the dual system or otherwise it would cause multiple paradoxes and new dualities all together
- 26,116
- 3,649
No, that is not how it goes. There is no neutral thing in a dual system. All that is neutral to it isn't participating in it.
And no, there can be multiple things that are not reflected in an opposite.
And no, there can be multiple things that are not reflected in an opposite.
- 6,590
- 1,698
Doesn't duality itself share duality with transduality per definition? Dual vs non-dual.
- 26,116
- 3,649
Duality isn't a thing, it's a set of categories. It would be akin to saying that Aristotelian and Platonic concepts are in a dual system for one another due to not conforming to one-another.
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #13
With duality being inumerable in nature it's not possible to find a few concepts or laws that hadn't been participating in it
- 26,116
- 3,649
Being innumerable is not a reason for that, no. There can be infinite things that lack an equal opposite.
- 11,080
- 2,389
- Thread starter
- #15
That's just type 3 transduality which is transcendent of the dual systems
