Transcending dimensionality

[XXKINGXX69]

How strong is transcending dimensionality? Not dimensions, just dimensionality

 

[KakarotGoku]

Both are technically the same but it can go from L1-A to 0 with a good chunk of context.

 

[Cat275]

L1-A at bare minimum and 0 at max.

 

[XXKINGXX69]

Both are technically the same but it can go from L1-A to 0 with a good chunk of context.

Dimensionality refers to how dimensions work and dimensions in general, while dimensions just mean whatever dimensions there are in the verse

 

[KakarotGoku]

Dimensionality refers to how dimensions work and dimensions in general, while dimensions just mean whatever dimensions there are in the verse

I didn't mean they are the literal same i just meant they are simillar or something like that.

 

[XXKINGXX69]

I didn't mean they are the literal same i just meant they are simillar or something like that.

They're not that similar

 

[KakarotGoku]

They're not that similar

Alright i guess correlated is the right word then.

 

[NHTkenshin2]

According to SMTs rating, its 1-A, for some reason

 

[Jibz]

Did homeboys just say transcending dimensionality is tier 0. Dimensionality itself is based on a set of reals.

 

[KakarotGoku]

According to SMTs rating, its 1-A, for some reason

Prolly because they consider it to be above real coordinate space.

Transcending dimensionallity is 1a at best.

 

[KakarotGoku]

Did homeboys just say transcending dimensionality is tier 0. Dimensionality itself is based on a set of reals.

May i know what a set of reals is?
Are you referring to a set of real number or something?

I don't see the problem of dimensionallity being 0 you can literally extend a hierarchy to 0 and dimensionallity or dimensions is just another word for it.

so you can extend dimensionallity to something like mahlo dimensionallity if given enough context.
(essentially it means you would transcend the pure essence of alephs and small cardinals.)

 

[ImmortalDread]

Guys, I have a question:

Is being above the concept of dimensionality, outer? Not dimensions, the concept of dimensionality.

 

[Qawsedf234]

No in of itself. We have a rule regarding this. Without supporting evidence it could be as low as just 5-D equalivent.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

By itself it is just Beyond Dimensional Existence or resistance to Space-Time manipulation.

Context makes it vary considerably

 

[Metallica_Kane]

Low 1-C

 

[Cat275]

Guys, I have a question:

Is being above the concept of dimensionality, outer? Not dimensions, the concept of dimensionality.

With context yes.
(Smt verse is an example.)

Without that much context no.