Tiers

[SupremeDoctor]

Since there is a huge power level difference between 1A character and High 1A characters, I think high 1A character should have their own tiers instead of just being put the same tier as 1A character.

The discription made it sound like high 1A characters are very close to tier 0 characters. What do you think Fandoms?

Anybody agree with me?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Technically High 1-As ARE very close to tier 0 characters, usually only being High 1-A due to a single weakness/drawback or by the presence of a tier 0 already within the verse

 

[PaChi2]

You just need understanding of how the tiers work. No need to change anything.

High 1-As are 0s with a minor weakness or someone above them.

 

[SupremeDoctor]

Oh I understand it alright, my understanding is what led me here,

So I would ask again- IF, let me paraphrase WeeklyBattles and PaChi2

"High 1-As ARE very close to tier 0 characters, usually only being High 1-A due to a single weakness/drawback or by the presence of a tier 0 already within the verse"

and

"High 1-As are 0s with a minor weakness or someone above them."

WHY ARE THEY CLASSIFIED AS REGULAR 1A'S?

I mean every tier is devided with ABC, "A" being the highest so let high A be regular 1A and find something else for regular 1A, so there will be a clear difference in the tier rather than just stating one is more powerful than the other.

 

[Kaltias]

They aren't classified as regular 1-As tho

 

[IkaniL]

Why not High 1-A+?

 

[RRTheEndMan]

tier names aren't you know, that important...

 

[SupremeDoctor]

Why not High 1-A+?

I like that.

 

[SupremeDoctor]

tier names aren't you know, that important...

Are you kidding, put tier 0 characters in tier 11C and see what happens.

Why not put different levels in Tier 0 and put high 1A beings on it?

 

[RRTheEndMan]

but we're talking about an unimportant fact... Occam Razor