Tier 4-A revision

[Ogurtsow]

The weakest characters destroys only two solar systems, while the strongest destroys millions and billions, but this is not enough to destroy the Milky Way Galaxy. Since this tier is too variable, I believe that it should be divided into subtiers.

Low 4-A. Multi-Solar System level: The minimum for this tier remains the same as it is now: desturction's distance between solar systems as the minimum distance between Sun and the next closest star, the Alpha Centauri. The strongest characters on this tier are able to destroy dozens of solar systems.

4-A. Star Cluster level: The minimum for this tier is destruction of the Local Interstellar Cloud, which has a size of 30 LY. The strongest characters on this tier are able to destroy hundreds of solar systems.

High 4-A. Multi-Star Cluster level: The minimum for this tier is destruction of the Local Bubble, which has a lenght of 300 LY. Weak characters on this tier are able to easily destroy thousands or even millions of solar systems.

If you have your own thoughts about this, please write them.

 

[Ogurtsow]

Bump.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

No offence, but these kind of threads are being spammed way too frequently, and really should be reserved for staff only threads. Anyway, I don't think they'll be making these changes any time soon.

 

[LordWhis]

@Ogurtsow:

It'd be much more useful to do something like this for 4-B or 3-B.

THOSE are the truly variable tiers !

 

[Ogurtsow]

@LordWhis Maybe we can use distance between Sun and Sedna, that is, 140 billion km or 0.014 LY for High 4-B (High Solar System level).

High 3-B can be done for characters that can destroy at least one galactic supercluster at a time. It should not be confused with simple clusters and groups of galaxies (like our Local Group).

 

[Assaltwaffle]

I don't know. I've been manning the Tier 4 revisions but adding 2 more tiers seems... excessive. 4-B is already bigger than 4-A, and adding two other, smaller, tiers to try and balance it may not be advisable.

On a cosmic scale with Inverse Square Law the values are naturally going to be stupid different.

We already thought about shrinking the lower tier 4s into a single Star level, but decided against it. All in all these wouldn't really effect our tiers too much, as so few characters are in these levels via calculation anyway.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

So could we just close the thread, this doesn't sound like a topic up for discussion; especially with non-staff members.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

So could we just close the thread, this doesn't sound like a topic up for discussion; especially with non-staff members.

I agree.

To the OP, Ogurtsow, you are welcome to take up this conversation with me on my wall if you so wish.