• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Three+-way fight and multiplier question

Saqphire

She/Her
140
97
I'm sure by the title you have deduced what my question will be but I've always wondered, and pardon if it's been asked before countless of times but:

Let's say three characters fight, let's call them A, B and C
  • A is fighting B and C together
  • B and C are either stated or portrayed narratively to be equal or relative in strength
  • A easily keeps up or even shitstomps both of them
  • Would that entail that A would be atleast twice as strong as B and C individually and thus you'd infer a 2x multiplier on their strength ?

This situation doesn't include hax in the equation
 
All Multipliers must come from statements and cannot be reasoned from something else. Like what Twilight said, Character A is just stronger by an unknown amount until a statement is made.

Even if Character A punched through both B and C at the same time, it would simply mean that the attack didn't lose significant energy from hitting both of them, rather than the attack being stronger.
 
All Multipliers must come from statements and cannot be reasoned from something else. Like what Twilight said, Character A is just stronger by an unknown amount until a statement is made.

Even if Character A punched through both B and C at the same time, it would simply mean that the attack didn't lose significant energy from hitting both of them, rather than the attack being stronger.
Damn, so according to standards I can't logically infer Shanks being 2x stronger than Kaido due to Kidd's showings against the both of them plus big mom (Shanks' singular DD vs BM+K's combo attack both one-tapping Kidd) 😔
 
Damn, so according to standards I can't logically infer Shanks being 2x stronger than Kaido due to Kidd's showings against the both of them plus big mom (Shanks' singular DD vs BM+K's combo attack both one-tapping Kidd) 😔
Yep, just that the DD didn't lose significant energy
 
Back
Top