• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The power of imagination VS The power of the script

Gork and Mork

VS

Featherine

according to the profiles both are at 1-A

Versions: Strongest known canon versions.

Victory Conditions: KO.

State of mind: Characters will employ their usual battle strategies

Knowledge of the other character/verse: No prior knowledge of each other.

Preparation time: None.
 
Hi, I don't quite understand those words like "stomp", "necro" "FRA", or other words, since I'm new to this forum... in other words, you mean that the 2 green brothers would be the winners, right? 😅😅
In general, stay the hell away from 1-A matches, 99.9% of the time they're stomps, which can't be added.
 
Hi, I don't quite understand those words like "stomp", "necro" "FRA", or other words, since I'm new to this forum... in other words, you mean that the 2 green brothers would be the winners, right? 😅😅

I encourage you to read that for details.

In this case, it's at the very least, a stat stomp, as the AP/Striking Strength/Durability difference is overwhelming enough that it's likely unreasonable for Featherine to win here.

"Necro" comes from "Necromancy" & stuff, a fictional kind of magic about reanimating the dead. Hence, "necro-posting", or "necro-ing" a thread is making a thread "alive" again by posting in it after it has been inactive for a very long time.
There are some types of threads where necro-ing is more acceptable, because time is less of a factor to the topic or relevance of such threads, but necro-ing is often frowned upon, especially in other thread types, like CRTs.

& "FRA" means "For (the) Reasons Above". It's against Versus Thread Rules to vote that a character would win without providing valid reasoning.
However, it is acceptable to cast a vote by expressing that you agree with someone else's already stated reasoning, presuming that reasoning is still valid, anyway.
If someone in a thread provides basis for a vote about who would win, it's notoriously common practice here for subsequent posters in that thread to make "FRA" posts, which are essentially just saying "I vote for X character because of Y reasoning that I agree with that was already posted in this thread."

Pardon all the words, please.
I hope that helps!
 

I encourage you to read that for details.

In this case, it's at the very least, a stat stomp, as the AP/Striking Strength/Durability difference is overwhelming enough that it's likely unreasonable for Featherine to win here.

"Necro" comes from "Necromancy" & stuff, a fictional kind of magic about reanimating the dead. Hence, "necro-posting", or "necro-ing" a thread is making a thread "alive" again by posting in it after it has been inactive for a very long time.
There are some types of threads where necro-ing is more acceptable, because time is less of a factor to the topic or relevance of such threads, but necro-ing is often frowned upon, especially in other thread types, like CRTs.

& "FRA" means "For (the) Reasons Above". It's against Versus Thread Rules to vote that a character would win without providing valid reasoning.
However, it is acceptable to cast a vote by expressing that you agree with someone else's already stated reasoning, presuming that reasoning is still valid, anyway.
If someone in a thread provides basis for a vote about who would win, it's notoriously common practice here for subsequent posters in that thread to make "FRA" posts, which are essentially just saying "I vote for X character because of Y reasoning that I agree with that was already posted in this thread."

Pardon all the words, please.
I hope that helps!
thank you so much :)
 
Back
Top