- 195
- 16
I believe that some of the profiles for canon disney may be inaccurate and not display the true capabilities of some of the characters. The first point I want to address is that in many of the profiles it includes that characters can 'cut those with durability similar to General Grievous with their lightsabers' which is a particularly bizzare justification for AP, as lightsabers ignore durability. Although Greivous is somewhat resistant to lightsabers, cutting him should denote striking strength not AP.
Some credit to Reppuzan for these suggestions.
Ventress
Ventress is rated as 8-B likely far higher. This is likely a very low ball as she has consistenly been a match for Anakin Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi. She has also telekinetically matched Luminara Unduli suggesting they are equals. Luminara is rated as at least 7-C, proving that Ventress should be upgraded from 8-B to 7-C.
Ashoka Tano
She is rated as 8-B for her telekenetic feat but may be potentialy higher. She has been portrayed as weaker but somewhat comprable to Barriss Ofee (who we have no profile for) who has accompanied Ashoka on several missions. She is shown to be weaker by her loss on coruscant. Barriss Ofee was able to conceal her prescence from Ventress an assassin capable of fighting Jedi Masters, and was able to penetrate the defences of a very pissed off Anakin Skywalker with a force push suggesting she should scale to Anakin's low end making her 7-C. Ashoka should scale to this as she is only slightly weaker. This isn't very far fetched as Ashoka was offered jedi knight hood in TCW suggesting she should scale to Anakins low end who was also a knight. She also penetrated the defences of Ventress with a force push, albeit she was not expecting the attack.
Grand Inquisitor
Is rated as 8-B for being slightly weaker than Ventress, he would be upgraded to 7-C or low 7-C to match Ventress' upgrades.
Kannan Jarrus
Rated as 7-C for defeating the Grand Inquisitor, he also becomes a knight meaning 7-C is consistent with the low end of Anakin Skywaker and Ashoka Tano.
Grievous
Have the justification 'can cut characters with durability similar to his own removed' as it makes little sense and causes confusion. WeeklyBattles made the argument in a thread that Greivous could never damage Zoro at his strongest because his lightsabers could only hurt people with 7-C durability. I don't think i need to go into why that doesn't make sense. This justification breeds confusion and should be removed. Greivous may also have his durability upgraded for legends on account of tanking a telekenetic blast from Shaak Ti.
TLDR: Sorry for wall of text, I don't usually make threads like this.
Ventress 7-C, matched Lumiara who is at least 7-C. Ashoka Tano 7-C, became a knight, comparable to Barriss Ofee who fought Anakin, can penetrate the defences of Ventress with force powers. Grand Inquisitor 7-C, comparable to Ventress. Kannan Jarrus 7-C, defeated the Grand Inquisitor, became a knight. Grievous, remove misleading justification, possible durability upgrade.
Someone who is more knowledgable may also want to make a profile for Barriss Ofee.
Some credit to Reppuzan for these suggestions.
Ventress
Ventress is rated as 8-B likely far higher. This is likely a very low ball as she has consistenly been a match for Anakin Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi. She has also telekinetically matched Luminara Unduli suggesting they are equals. Luminara is rated as at least 7-C, proving that Ventress should be upgraded from 8-B to 7-C.
Ashoka Tano
She is rated as 8-B for her telekenetic feat but may be potentialy higher. She has been portrayed as weaker but somewhat comprable to Barriss Ofee (who we have no profile for) who has accompanied Ashoka on several missions. She is shown to be weaker by her loss on coruscant. Barriss Ofee was able to conceal her prescence from Ventress an assassin capable of fighting Jedi Masters, and was able to penetrate the defences of a very pissed off Anakin Skywalker with a force push suggesting she should scale to Anakin's low end making her 7-C. Ashoka should scale to this as she is only slightly weaker. This isn't very far fetched as Ashoka was offered jedi knight hood in TCW suggesting she should scale to Anakins low end who was also a knight. She also penetrated the defences of Ventress with a force push, albeit she was not expecting the attack.
Grand Inquisitor
Is rated as 8-B for being slightly weaker than Ventress, he would be upgraded to 7-C or low 7-C to match Ventress' upgrades.
Kannan Jarrus
Rated as 7-C for defeating the Grand Inquisitor, he also becomes a knight meaning 7-C is consistent with the low end of Anakin Skywaker and Ashoka Tano.
Grievous
Have the justification 'can cut characters with durability similar to his own removed' as it makes little sense and causes confusion. WeeklyBattles made the argument in a thread that Greivous could never damage Zoro at his strongest because his lightsabers could only hurt people with 7-C durability. I don't think i need to go into why that doesn't make sense. This justification breeds confusion and should be removed. Greivous may also have his durability upgraded for legends on account of tanking a telekenetic blast from Shaak Ti.
TLDR: Sorry for wall of text, I don't usually make threads like this.
Ventress 7-C, matched Lumiara who is at least 7-C. Ashoka Tano 7-C, became a knight, comparable to Barriss Ofee who fought Anakin, can penetrate the defences of Ventress with force powers. Grand Inquisitor 7-C, comparable to Ventress. Kannan Jarrus 7-C, defeated the Grand Inquisitor, became a knight. Grievous, remove misleading justification, possible durability upgrade.
Someone who is more knowledgable may also want to make a profile for Barriss Ofee.