- 6,149
- 16,238
A while ago I was reading through our (relatively) recent page on Reality-Fiction Transcendence and this bit caught my eye:
Made me wonder: Suppose we have a verse that doesn't equate reality-fiction layers to higher or lower dimensions. In this verse, each higher reality layer is from its own internal perspective a perfectly normal 3-dimensional reality (And this is truly the case. It's not explained away as "Just what lower beings can perceive" or anything like that). Does it make sense, then, to say that these layers each equal a single dimensional jump?
I ask because, if the verse doesn't say R>F layers and dimensions are the same, then that would mean even the lower dimensions of the higher world, and not just its 3-D space, would transcend the lower world, so a higher layer in that case would be worth 3 dimensional jumps (One for each dimensional subset of the higher world), and not just one. This in principle works downwards, too. So, if a verse has a baseline world, and then a lower layer which it sees as fiction, that lower layer would be 11-C and not 11-A, since it'd be below even the lower-dimensional subsets of the baseline world.
Of course, that'd work only for verses where each reality-fiction layer has its own dimensional spaces, but even those currently seem to have their layers equated to single dimensional jumps. Why is that, exactly? My first guess is that we'd require the verse to show lower-dimensional spaces actually exist, but it seems we've equated R>F Layers to singular dimensional jumps even in verses that actually do that (SCP as it was before all the Tier 0 upgrades comes to mind, as seen in the first key here).
My second question came up when I stumbled on this profile earlier today. It has this description in it:
The argument that the page seems to make is that, since beings in each layer have even shown to add dimensions in a way that doesn't reach into the higher world above them, this means that each story layer in the verse's hierarchy would surpass any (countable) amount of dimensions, and as such be in the 1-A range?
So my question here is: Do we allow reasoning of this sort? If an author character demonstrates the ability to add dimensions to their fictional work at will, but hasn't explicitly been shown adding infinitely many, do we assume they are above even infinitely many additions of dimensions, still?
A character that qualifies would usually then scale to one level of infinity higher than the totality of the cosmology they transcend. So for example, viewing a Low 2-C to 2-A cosmology as fiction would grant Low 1-C, doing so to a 6-Dimensional Low 1-C construct would scale the character to 1-C, doing so to a 10-Dimensional High 1-C structure would be the equivalent of an 11-D High 1-C and so on. However, depending on the details and depictions of the Reality-Fiction Transcendence, it can be more than a simple 'dimensional jump', for example because each reality-fiction "level" having been explained to contain more than one level of infinity (e.g. due to containing large higher-dimensional spaces or similar).
Made me wonder: Suppose we have a verse that doesn't equate reality-fiction layers to higher or lower dimensions. In this verse, each higher reality layer is from its own internal perspective a perfectly normal 3-dimensional reality (And this is truly the case. It's not explained away as "Just what lower beings can perceive" or anything like that). Does it make sense, then, to say that these layers each equal a single dimensional jump?
I ask because, if the verse doesn't say R>F layers and dimensions are the same, then that would mean even the lower dimensions of the higher world, and not just its 3-D space, would transcend the lower world, so a higher layer in that case would be worth 3 dimensional jumps (One for each dimensional subset of the higher world), and not just one. This in principle works downwards, too. So, if a verse has a baseline world, and then a lower layer which it sees as fiction, that lower layer would be 11-C and not 11-A, since it'd be below even the lower-dimensional subsets of the baseline world.
Of course, that'd work only for verses where each reality-fiction layer has its own dimensional spaces, but even those currently seem to have their layers equated to single dimensional jumps. Why is that, exactly? My first guess is that we'd require the verse to show lower-dimensional spaces actually exist, but it seems we've equated R>F Layers to singular dimensional jumps even in verses that actually do that (SCP as it was before all the Tier 0 upgrades comes to mind, as seen in the first key here).
My second question came up when I stumbled on this profile earlier today. It has this description in it:
Even dimensions are completely irrelevant to the characters that resides in the upper world stories. An example of this is how Wilson Taylor wrote the Tommy Taylor series where there are mages who can "add entire dimensions to physical space" and resides in "hyperplanes". The world of Tommy Taylor exist but it exists in a lower story and is nothing but fiction to the higher world where Wilson Taylor resides. This shows that the difference between the lower story and higher story is more than dimensions
The argument that the page seems to make is that, since beings in each layer have even shown to add dimensions in a way that doesn't reach into the higher world above them, this means that each story layer in the verse's hierarchy would surpass any (countable) amount of dimensions, and as such be in the 1-A range?
So my question here is: Do we allow reasoning of this sort? If an author character demonstrates the ability to add dimensions to their fictional work at will, but hasn't explicitly been shown adding infinitely many, do we assume they are above even infinitely many additions of dimensions, still?