- 15,130
- 6,902
This character is ranked as "At least Low 2-C" via being much more stronger than a Low 2-C character .
This other one is ranked as "2-B" via being stronger than a 2-C and 2-C , likely 2-B characters .
And now a question, because here I have a doubt: If "Low 2-C x 2 =/= 2-C", then why you are 2-B if you are much more stronger than 2-Cs?
Why is the difference between 2-Cs and 2-Bs quantifiable and the difference between Low 2-Cs and 2-Cs isn't?
This other one is ranked as "2-B" via being stronger than a 2-C and 2-C , likely 2-B characters .
And now a question, because here I have a doubt: If "Low 2-C x 2 =/= 2-C", then why you are 2-B if you are much more stronger than 2-Cs?
Why is the difference between 2-Cs and 2-Bs quantifiable and the difference between Low 2-Cs and 2-Cs isn't?