Small Monument Mythos CRT

[Roachman40]

Special Tree

I remade the special tree profile here

Just added citations and added 8-C to the profile, considering it destroying the monument was calced.

Resistance to Durability Negation & Spatial Manipulation (Giza Glass Blades are incapable of cutting a Special Tree's trunk, merely stunt its growth)

Leonard Morlin said this during STARRYSPHINX I believe? and due to Leonard Morlin's unwilling deal with the ADA to spread misinformation among reliable sources, I dont think we should have this on the profile at all.

Large Size (Type 2 for their extension above ground, possibly Type 8 for their full, interdimensional extension)

The type 8 seems to be referring to wonderland? the trees aren't actually universe sized, they are just stacked up on each other.

Intelligence: High.

I dont think there's anything proof to warrant a High rating, hell the profile doesn't even list any reason for the rating. We dont really see the trees do anything, and in WASHINGTONWONDERLAND the humanoid tree doesn't exactly do anything to warrant High either.


Cornerfolk

Cornerfolk actually vary alot in size, from 3 inches to 10 meters, so im thinking a 'Varies; from 10-C to possibly 9-B' is fine.

 

[Sir_Ovens]

Yeah I agree with the changes. But wasn't it stated somewhere that Giza Glass couldn't cut Special Trees? Wouldn't that give it resistance to spatial manip?

 

[Shmooply]

As usual, I agree with the OP.

 

[Roachman40]

Yeah I agree with the changes. But wasn't it stated somewhere that Giza Glass couldn't cut Special Trees? Wouldn't that give it resistance to spatial manip?

Not that I remember? the only time that I remember it being stated that giza glass was used to try and cut trees was in STARRYSPHINX, which shouldn't be used for reasons mentioned.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Wow I ******* hate that pic.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Also Leonard's claim is legitimate it's backed by Alex. The thing that is propaganda is the Extraterrestrial stuff.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Yeah I agree with the changes. But wasn't it stated somewhere that Giza Glass couldn't cut Special Trees? Wouldn't that give it resistance to spatial manip?

It was. I don't see why not. The existence of the Giza Guardian project proves that the Guardians are an actual thing and not ADA propaganda, and they couldn't cut Special Trees with their swords.

 

[Roachman40]

Also Leonard's claim is legitimate it's backed by Alex. The thing that is propaganda is the Extraterrestrial stuff.

from the Q&A things you showed me, the nuclear bomb statement was legitimate, although the statement of giza glass being used on trees doesn't seem to be backed up

at most, a 'possibly Resistance to Durability Negation & Spatial Manipulation' is best

 

[Roachman40]

It was. I don't see why not. The existence of the Giza Guardian project proves that the Guardians are an actual thing and not ADA propaganda, and they couldn't cut Special Trees with their swords.

Its not that the giza guardians are ADA propoganda, its giza guardians interaction with the trees that is likely propaganda.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Not gonna argue with that. Just please keep the Rockefeller Tree image for the main picture instead of the low-res render.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Its not that the giza guardians are ADA propoganda, its giza guardians interaction with the trees that is likely propaganda.

I don't think that makes much sense since the statement that Giza Glass can't cut Special Trees but nuclear bombs can is delivered in the same sentence, and Alex's Q&A confirms that the later is legitimate so why would only one half of one sentence be real?

 

[Roachman40]

I don't think that makes much sense since the statement that Giza Glass can't cut Special Trees but nuclear bombs can is delivered in the same sentence, and Alex's Q&A confirms that the later is legitimate so why would only one half of one sentence be real?

Because Leonard Morlin's unwilling deal with the ADA to spread misinformation among reliable sources? just because one thing is possibly correct doesn't really mean that everything else would be as well.

and in the Q&A, alex only says that 'those behind the manhattan project' where involved, which is kinda vague.

It still does imply that nuclear explosives where involved though, so I guess 'possibly Town level' can stay.

 

[Gewsbumpz_dude]

Everything here looks alright, but I think you should add scans to the AP and Durability.

As for the Giza Glass WOG statement, a possibly would be fine since it isn't quite backed up in the source material, but there doesn't seem to be anything contradicting it.

 

[Roachman40]

seems fine

bump

 

[Roachman40]

bump

 

[Roachman40]

bump

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

I think the revisions can be applied but I'm not a fan of the change of picture to the render.

 

[Roachman40]

I think the revisions can be applied but I'm not a fan of the change of picture to the render.

I mean, their dosen't seem to be anything wrong with the render.

 

[Roachman40]

otherwise, the changes have been added

this can be closed.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Awesome