• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Should it be at least or possibly higher?

22,572
13,849
I made this SCP-1025 article

it says 10-B with diseases because it killed class-D’s in the test logs. But I don’t see peak humans or street level humans in the log/article.

but if it can kill average humans and in real life. Peak humans and possibly street level humans like Bruce lee. They can still die from diseases.

should I say at least 10-B or should I say 10-B possibly higher?

which is the correct way?

and is it okay to say in the attack potency. Diseases allow it to ignore conventional durability. Since it can kill from the inside out.
 
Reading through the profile, the book itself should be 10-C. However, you should write in its attack potency explanation that it can ignore durability.

Viruses don't require AP to kill people, it just ignores durability since it affects things on a cellular level. Not to mention the fact that the book has other sicknesses like cancer or maybe even osteoporosis. None of that stuff needs AP to do its job.

A CRT should be made to change the content of this page btw so that it won't be mistaken as vandalism.
 
Reading through the profile, the book itself should be 10-C. However, you should write in its attack potency explanation that it can ignore durability.

Viruses don't require AP to kill people, it just ignores durability since it affects things on a cellular level. Not to mention the fact that the book has other sicknesses like cancer or maybe even osteoporosis. None of that stuff needs AP to do its job.

A CRT should be made to change the content of this page btw so that it won't be mistaken as vandalism.

so i should just say tier 10-C and remove the tier 10-B?
 
Yep

Physically, it's just a book, but its real power comes from its ability to give diseases and its symptoms. I haven't read SCP lately, but did the SCP team try to destroy it?
 
Makes sense for them to do that. 10-C physical stats is fine if there's nothing that implies the book is indestructible.

does the article look better.

also


i did borrow/copy some of the tier classes of the ebola virus for scp-1025.

Is that fine or not fine?

because since 1025 does have viruses in it's book plus other cellular affecting diseases. It should have similar tier stats.

would that be okay?
 
Back
Top