Shadow Physiology

[Sniper670]

What do you get for being an shadow?

Character in question cannot exist in reality so it appears as a shadow instead

 

[Shiroiyo]

Incorporeality and Intangibility comes to mind.

 

[Sniper670]

Incorporeality and Intangibility comes to mind.

Would it be nep to say it has not soul.

 

[Cat275]

Would it be nep to say it has not soul.

I mean, we do have nature type 1 aspect 1 do we?

 

[Sniper670]

You're right.

I guess one cab get NEP for being I immaterially intangible and has no soul, or any of the aspects

 

[Sniper670]

Quick question

Character in question is an illusion and doesn't exist. Akin to the reflection of a mountain on the lake, he's that reflection.

Nature Type 1 nep?

 

[Cat275]

Quick question

Character in question is an illusion and doesn't exist. Akin to the reflection of a mountain on the lake, he's that reflection.

Nature Type 1 nep?

Yeah if the statements are not flowery language.

(Sounds like flowery language to me honestly so probably not, with the current context presented here.)

 

[Sniper670]

Well....

That was the nature of the character, akin to a reflection on a lake

 

[Cat275]

Well....

That was the nature of the character, akin to a reflection on a lake

That doesn't sound nep to me honestly.

(Due to how flowery language like, it sounds.

And the lack of context at the surface)

How do you do that word with link thing?

 

[Sniper670]

Still not nep? This was followed by the scan I sent earlier. The character is the antimatter world, a paradox of existence in this context, not antimatter in physics

Linking text

 

[Cat275]

Now that's nep.

(Nature type 1 or 3)

 

[Sniper670]

Yes, that's what confuses me a little

Although DT clarified that illusions qualify for nep nature type 1.

Like this guy, who was given nep type 1 by DT for being akin to the reflection of the moon on a lake

Thoughts?

 

[Cat275]

Like this guy, who was given nep type 1 by DT for being akin to the reflection of the moon on a lake

I mean there was a good heck amount of context for this guy.

I also don't know which message your referring to since it kinda had way to many messages about different people or such.
(Also it was about graham and anos and not mer)

 

[Sniper670]

You're right, there's more context. This was DT reply to the scans.

Nature Type 1; Aspect Type 1. I wrote Aspect Type 2 earlier in this thread, but I think that was a typo in retrospect. His avatar has no body and no soul, so it should be spiritual nonexistence.

I was thinking type 3, but being a reflection seems like type 1 to me, I dunno.

 

[Cat275]

I was thinking type 3, but being a reflection seems like type 1 to me, I dunno.

Type 1 is also fine.

 

[Sniper670]

Thanks for the input