SCP-682 vs Lavos

[manu_zarri]

this match came to my mind, and I thought it was a good match.
this is SCP-682 vs Lavos

• Speed Equalized
• Time Devourer Lavos is used
• Leviathan SCP-682 is used
• Both are 2-A
• Win by KO or Death.

Hard-to-Destroy Reptile:

Lavos:

Inconclusive:

 

[manu_zarri]

bump (no bump has been done)

 

[manu_zarri]

bump

 

[manu_zarri]

bump

 

[manu_zarri]

Bump

 

[manu_zarri]

bump

 

[manu_zarri]

bump

 

[Galvino]

I don't see Higher-Dimensional Existence on Lavos' page, idk if he could even comprehend 682.

 

[manu_zarri]

I don't see Higher-Dimensional Existence on Lavos' page, idk if he could even comprehend 682.

i mean he still have 2-A range so

 

[Galvino]

i mean he still have 2-A range so

Idk exactly how that works cause I'm not too familiar with the exact rules of this wiki, but let's say I have a gun and I have the range to shoot 682, would it matter if I can't see or comprehend it?

 

[manu_zarri]

Idk exactly how that works cause I'm not too familiar with the exact rules of this wiki, but let's say I have a gun and I have the range to shoot 682, would it matter if I can't see or comprehend it?

Lavos has cosmic awaraness on 2-A range. should be enough for understands a part of 682

 

[Galvino]

Lavos has cosmic awaraness on 2-A range. should be enough for understands a part of 682

If Lavos can comprehend 682, then maybe Lavos wins cause it seems to have more haxes compared to 682.

 

[manu_zarri]

If Lavos can comprehend 682, then maybe Lavos wins cause it seems to have more haxes compared to 682.

682 adapts. however I noticed that the 682 profile is outdated and has no larg size for the leviathan, so it would be more easy

 

[EliminatorVenom]

This should be inconclusive, I think? I wish there was more to comment on, but Lavos seems stronger and initially more varied, but he doesn't bring anything new to the table that 682 already doesn't adapt, nor do 682 seem to be able to kill him. Maybe it is a Lavos victory if his power can evolve to the point of countering Laavos, but anything else is off the table.

 

[Galvino]

Maybe it is a Lavos victory if his power can evolve to the point of countering Laavos, but anything else is off the table.

wym?

 

[EliminatorVenom]

Unless I'm missing something from 682's profile, which I might well be, he doesn't have any tool to really kill Lavos aside from trying to overpower him.

Even in the hypothesis of some form of hax managing to go through Lavos' very solid defenses, Lavos does have his weird ability that is very much used in combat of pulling of an alternate version of himself from another timeline into existance.

Or at least I think he had that ability. I remember seeing it being debated with scans. Imma look more thoroughly.

 

[manu_zarri]

I'm actually pretty sure things like SCP-682 would be capable of destroying a normal 2-A multiverse. so how does Lavos immortality works?

 

[deonment]

Every moment has a version of lavos in it, and also the alt timelines too, so you need to wiped them out wholly and retroactively otherwise another is going to come back

 

[manu_zarri]

Every moment has a version of lavos in it, and also the alt timelines too, so you need to wiped them out wholly and retroactively otherwise another is going to come back

well Leviathans stomped Mekhane which fighted Yaldabaoth, which did stuff like that. btw Leviathans can also do damage to the Tree and tree contain in itself infinite multiverses (yes they scales above baseline)

 

[EliminatorVenom]

That link isn't working, and dealing damage to a thing that has infinite timelines on it doesn't equate on you being able to attack all of them at the same time.

Making a poor analogy, you may be able to tear a paper with your hands, it doesn't mean you can tear every single milimeter of paper at the same time.

 

[Rez]

Yeah this feels like an incon

 

[Lawiegg]

Inconclosive

 

[DaReaperMan]

Inconclosive

The lizard doesn't have a 2-A key anymore.