- 32,358
- 20,298
Akuto Sai.
The interview was done with Kurumada.
You can't counter the author's words.
The interview was done with Kurumada.
You can't counter the author's words.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
saint seiya speed upgrade!
- Thread starter Victor2
- Start date
-
- Tags
- saint seiya
- 32,358
- 20,298
There is also no indication that they were in Heaven / Tenkai, or even that the attack destroyed the universe, as some say.
- 584
- 14
http://philipho.tripod.com/History.html
^It says nothing about what Apollo did the actual interview states that Apollo was infact a benevolent being so he erased their memories and let them be? Also yes they were in Olympus did you read next dimension?
^It says nothing about what Apollo did the actual interview states that Apollo was infact a benevolent being so he erased their memories and let them be? Also yes they were in Olympus did you read next dimension?
- 32,358
- 20,298
Heaven Chapter Overture came out before Next Dimension, and they don't say that they are in Olympus when that happened.
In the movie Artemis simply warped the Sanctuary of Athena into her own.
In the movie Artemis simply warped the Sanctuary of Athena into her own.
- 584
- 14
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2o4WfHJfEq0
Pause at 2:32 we literally see the moon top of them and the platform their standing
Just like in here http://*********.com/Manga/Saint-Se...Dimension-15--The-Temple-of-the-Moon?id=44304
The movie ended on a cliffhanger the author simply explained what occurred afterwards he didn't cover anything prior you are taking things out context
Prove that it was earth despite all the evidence and prove that it was specifically directed towards something
"Begone manking" - Apollo
Not the sanctuary...
Pause at 2:32 we literally see the moon top of them and the platform their standing
Just like in here http://*********.com/Manga/Saint-Se...Dimension-15--The-Temple-of-the-Moon?id=44304
The movie ended on a cliffhanger the author simply explained what occurred afterwards he didn't cover anything prior you are taking things out context
Prove that it was earth despite all the evidence and prove that it was specifically directed towards something
"Begone manking" - Apollo
Not the sanctuary...
- 32,358
- 20,298
Still doesn't prove that he rebooted the universe. At best he Erased their Memories and rewinded time.
- 584
- 14
I personally think he used reality warping but whatever at the very least he didn't simply erase the memories of them.
The profile should state: Apollo"s feat was too vague to be quantifiable however he still fought the unsealed Titans for 10 years,altered reality etc.
What the profile suggests is that he only erased memories in the whole movie..
The profile should state: Apollo"s feat was too vague to be quantifiable however he still fought the unsealed Titans for 10 years,altered reality etc.
What the profile suggests is that he only erased memories in the whole movie..
I don't mean to revive a dead thread but i didn't know what else to do.. i found these articles that may help with scaling the feat to be higher perhaps... these are articles that were done in the last year.. i bolded the important information...
Articles, information, and cited sources.
"Cosmic inflation holds that the Big Bang began with a period of exponential expansion that swelled our universe from a fragile quantum speck to a vast manor of emptiness a quarter-billion-light-years wide in a flicker of a flicker of time."
https://news.stanford.edu/2018/09/10/string-theory-landscape/ ________________________________________________________________________________ "Because the expansion is not just exponential but also incredibly rapid, "doubling" happens on timescale of around 10^-35 seconds. Meaning, by time 10^-34 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 1000 times its initial size; by time 10^-33 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 10^30 (or 1000^10) times its initial size; by time 10^-32 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 10^300 times its initial size, and so on. Exponential isn't so powerful because it's fast; it's so powerful because it's relentless."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...doesnt-break-the-speed-of-light/#102ba9531e40 _______________________________________________________________________________________ "With the proper definition of the "size" of the universe, this question does make sense. The standard model of cosmology would say that the universe is infinite which therefore does not have a "size". However, if we take into account that the big bang occurred 13.7┬▒0.1713.7┬▒0.17 billion years ago we can define a meaningful size for the observable universe. You might, for example, define the size of the observable universe as the distance a photon could have traveled since the big bang.
Consider, for example, a cosmic microwave background (CMB) photon that was emitted as visible light about 379,000 years after the big bang and is just now hitting our microwave detectors (the redshift is z=1089): that photon has been traveling for 13.7 billion years so it has traveled a distance of 13.7 billion light years. So you might imagine that the current radius of the observable universe is 13.7 billion light years. However, during this time the universe has been expanding, so the current position of the matter that emitted that photon will now be 46.5 billion light years away. (By now, the little 10^5 ^105 bumps on the CMB will have condensed into galaxies and stars at that distance.) This gives a diameter of the current observable universe of 93 billion light years. Note that as time passes, the size of the observable universe will increase. In fact it will increase by significantly more than two (to convert radius to diameter) light years per year because of the continued (accelerating) expansion of the universe. Also note that we will not be able to use photons (light) to explore the universe earlier than 379,000 years after the big bang since the universe was opaque to photons at that time. However, in the future we could conceivably use neutrinos or gravitational wave telescopes to explore the earlier universe.
So given a size of the current observable universe, we can ask how big was that volume at any particular time in the past. According to this paper at the end of inflation the universe's scale factor was about 10^30 10^30 smaller than it is today, so that would give a diameter for the currently observable universe at the end of inflation of 0.88 millimeters which is approximately the size of a grain of sand (See calculation at WolframAlpha).
It is believed that inflation needed to expand the universe by at least a factor of 60 e-foldings (which is a factor of e60e60). So using WolframAlpha again we find that the diameter of the universe before inflation would have been 7.7├ù10^ÔêÆ30 7.7├ù10^ÔêÆ30 meters which is only about 480,000 Planck lengths.
Perhaps Brian Greene was talking about the size of the observable universe at the time when the CMB photons started traveling towards us. That happened 379,000 years after the big bang at a redshift of 10^98 which means the universe was about 84.6 million light years in diameter which, per WolframAlpha, is about half the diameter of the local super cluster of galaxies or about 840 times the diameter of our galaxy."
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/32917/size-of-universe-after-inflatio
_____________________________________________ "
The inflationary era began a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang. The figure would be given by writing zero, then a decimal point, then 35 zeroes, followed by a 1. This is roughly one trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang.
Inflation only lasted another tiny fractional second — that number would have about 32 zeros.
The scale of the universe expanded exponentially in that brief span. A distance of one nanometer would have been enlarged to a quarter of a billion light-years."
https://www.space.com/25075-cosmic-inflation-universe-expansion-big-bang-infographic.html ____________________________________________ "
The Universe was once just the radius of the Earth-to-the-Sun, which happened when the Universe was about a trillionth (10^-12) of a second old. The expansion rate of the Universe back then was 10^29 times what it is today.
If we want to, we can go back even farther, of course, to when inflation first came to an end, giving rise to the hot Big Bang. We like to extrapolate our Universe back to a singularity, but inflation takes the need for that completely away. Instead, it replaces it with a period of exponential expansion of indeterminate length to the past, and it comes to an end by giving rise to a hot, dense, expanding state we identify as the start of the Universe we know. We are connected to the last tiny fraction of a second of inflation, somewhere between 10^-30 and 10^-35 seconds worth of it. Whenever that time happens to be, where inflation ends and the Big Bang begins, that's when we need to know the size of the Universe.
Again, this is the observable Universe; the true "size of the Universe" is surely much bigger than what we can see, but we don't know by how much. Our best limits, from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Planck satellite, tell us that if the Universe does curve back in on itself and close, the part we can see is so indistinguishable from "uncurved" that it much be at least 250 times the radius of the observable part.
In truth, it might even be infinite in extent, as whatever the Universe did in the early stages of inflation is unknowable to us, with everything but the last tiny fraction-of-a-second of inflation's history being wiped clean from what we can observe by the nature of inflation itself. But if we're talking about the observable Universe, and we know we're only able to access somewhere between the last 10^-30 and 10^-35 seconds of inflation before the Big Bang happens, then we know the observable Universe is between 17 centimeters (for the 10^-35 second version) and 168 meters (for the 10-30second version) in size at the start of the hot, dense state we call the Big Bang."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...e-at-the-moment-of-its-creation/#584c51b64cea __________________________________________________________________________ "There is no theoretical bound on the expansion rate because it itself isn't a speed, but rather a property of the Universe that's determined by the amount of energy in it. Today, that rate is around 70 km/s/Mpc, but during inflation, it was likely some 10^50times higher."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...doesnt-break-the-speed-of-light/#423827731e40 ____________________________________________________________________________ "After 10^-30 seconds of inflation, even a Universe initially of Plank size 10^-33cm attains a large size of 10^10^10cm. Clearly, inflation increases the size of the Universe by many orders of magnitude which is a major concept behind how inflation solves problems of the Big-Bang Cosmology.
(PDF) A Review on Cosmic Inflation. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317341105_A_Review_on_Cosmic_Inflatio [accessed Sep 21 2018]."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317341105_A_Review_on_Cosmic_Inflatio _____________________
"It's possible that the Universe, where inflation occurred, barely attained a size larger than what we can observe. It's possible that, any year now, the evidence for an "edge" to where inflation happened will materialize. But it's also possible that the Universe is googols of times larger than what we can observe. Until we can answer these questions, we may never know.
Bang, the Universe underwent a period of cosmic inflation. Instead of being filled with matter and radiation, and instead of being hot, the Universe washttps://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-how-large-is-the-entire-unobservable-universe-73adef0fd480 : https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-how-large-is-the-entire-unobservable-universe-73adef0fd480
> filled with energy inherent to space itself,
> expanding at a constant, exponential rate,
> and creating new space so quickly that the smallest physical length scale, the Planck length, would be stretched to the size of the presently observable Universe every 10^―32 seconds."
Articles, information, and cited sources.
"Cosmic inflation holds that the Big Bang began with a period of exponential expansion that swelled our universe from a fragile quantum speck to a vast manor of emptiness a quarter-billion-light-years wide in a flicker of a flicker of time."
https://news.stanford.edu/2018/09/10/string-theory-landscape/ ________________________________________________________________________________ "Because the expansion is not just exponential but also incredibly rapid, "doubling" happens on timescale of around 10^-35 seconds. Meaning, by time 10^-34 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 1000 times its initial size; by time 10^-33 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 10^30 (or 1000^10) times its initial size; by time 10^-32 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 10^300 times its initial size, and so on. Exponential isn't so powerful because it's fast; it's so powerful because it's relentless."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...doesnt-break-the-speed-of-light/#102ba9531e40 _______________________________________________________________________________________ "With the proper definition of the "size" of the universe, this question does make sense. The standard model of cosmology would say that the universe is infinite which therefore does not have a "size". However, if we take into account that the big bang occurred 13.7┬▒0.1713.7┬▒0.17 billion years ago we can define a meaningful size for the observable universe. You might, for example, define the size of the observable universe as the distance a photon could have traveled since the big bang.
Consider, for example, a cosmic microwave background (CMB) photon that was emitted as visible light about 379,000 years after the big bang and is just now hitting our microwave detectors (the redshift is z=1089): that photon has been traveling for 13.7 billion years so it has traveled a distance of 13.7 billion light years. So you might imagine that the current radius of the observable universe is 13.7 billion light years. However, during this time the universe has been expanding, so the current position of the matter that emitted that photon will now be 46.5 billion light years away. (By now, the little 10^5 ^105 bumps on the CMB will have condensed into galaxies and stars at that distance.) This gives a diameter of the current observable universe of 93 billion light years. Note that as time passes, the size of the observable universe will increase. In fact it will increase by significantly more than two (to convert radius to diameter) light years per year because of the continued (accelerating) expansion of the universe. Also note that we will not be able to use photons (light) to explore the universe earlier than 379,000 years after the big bang since the universe was opaque to photons at that time. However, in the future we could conceivably use neutrinos or gravitational wave telescopes to explore the earlier universe.
So given a size of the current observable universe, we can ask how big was that volume at any particular time in the past. According to this paper at the end of inflation the universe's scale factor was about 10^30 10^30 smaller than it is today, so that would give a diameter for the currently observable universe at the end of inflation of 0.88 millimeters which is approximately the size of a grain of sand (See calculation at WolframAlpha).
It is believed that inflation needed to expand the universe by at least a factor of 60 e-foldings (which is a factor of e60e60). So using WolframAlpha again we find that the diameter of the universe before inflation would have been 7.7├ù10^ÔêÆ30 7.7├ù10^ÔêÆ30 meters which is only about 480,000 Planck lengths.
Perhaps Brian Greene was talking about the size of the observable universe at the time when the CMB photons started traveling towards us. That happened 379,000 years after the big bang at a redshift of 10^98 which means the universe was about 84.6 million light years in diameter which, per WolframAlpha, is about half the diameter of the local super cluster of galaxies or about 840 times the diameter of our galaxy."
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/32917/size-of-universe-after-inflatio
_____________________________________________ "
The inflationary era began a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang. The figure would be given by writing zero, then a decimal point, then 35 zeroes, followed by a 1. This is roughly one trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang.
Inflation only lasted another tiny fractional second — that number would have about 32 zeros.
The scale of the universe expanded exponentially in that brief span. A distance of one nanometer would have been enlarged to a quarter of a billion light-years."
https://www.space.com/25075-cosmic-inflation-universe-expansion-big-bang-infographic.html ____________________________________________ "
The Universe was once just the radius of the Earth-to-the-Sun, which happened when the Universe was about a trillionth (10^-12) of a second old. The expansion rate of the Universe back then was 10^29 times what it is today.
If we want to, we can go back even farther, of course, to when inflation first came to an end, giving rise to the hot Big Bang. We like to extrapolate our Universe back to a singularity, but inflation takes the need for that completely away. Instead, it replaces it with a period of exponential expansion of indeterminate length to the past, and it comes to an end by giving rise to a hot, dense, expanding state we identify as the start of the Universe we know. We are connected to the last tiny fraction of a second of inflation, somewhere between 10^-30 and 10^-35 seconds worth of it. Whenever that time happens to be, where inflation ends and the Big Bang begins, that's when we need to know the size of the Universe.
Again, this is the observable Universe; the true "size of the Universe" is surely much bigger than what we can see, but we don't know by how much. Our best limits, from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Planck satellite, tell us that if the Universe does curve back in on itself and close, the part we can see is so indistinguishable from "uncurved" that it much be at least 250 times the radius of the observable part.
In truth, it might even be infinite in extent, as whatever the Universe did in the early stages of inflation is unknowable to us, with everything but the last tiny fraction-of-a-second of inflation's history being wiped clean from what we can observe by the nature of inflation itself. But if we're talking about the observable Universe, and we know we're only able to access somewhere between the last 10^-30 and 10^-35 seconds of inflation before the Big Bang happens, then we know the observable Universe is between 17 centimeters (for the 10^-35 second version) and 168 meters (for the 10-30second version) in size at the start of the hot, dense state we call the Big Bang."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...e-at-the-moment-of-its-creation/#584c51b64cea __________________________________________________________________________ "There is no theoretical bound on the expansion rate because it itself isn't a speed, but rather a property of the Universe that's determined by the amount of energy in it. Today, that rate is around 70 km/s/Mpc, but during inflation, it was likely some 10^50times higher."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...doesnt-break-the-speed-of-light/#423827731e40 ____________________________________________________________________________ "After 10^-30 seconds of inflation, even a Universe initially of Plank size 10^-33cm attains a large size of 10^10^10cm. Clearly, inflation increases the size of the Universe by many orders of magnitude which is a major concept behind how inflation solves problems of the Big-Bang Cosmology.
(PDF) A Review on Cosmic Inflation. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317341105_A_Review_on_Cosmic_Inflatio [accessed Sep 21 2018]."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317341105_A_Review_on_Cosmic_Inflatio _____________________
"It's possible that the Universe, where inflation occurred, barely attained a size larger than what we can observe. It's possible that, any year now, the evidence for an "edge" to where inflation happened will materialize. But it's also possible that the Universe is googols of times larger than what we can observe. Until we can answer these questions, we may never know.
Bang, the Universe underwent a period of cosmic inflation. Instead of being filled with matter and radiation, and instead of being hot, the Universe washttps://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-how-large-is-the-entire-unobservable-universe-73adef0fd480 : https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-how-large-is-the-entire-unobservable-universe-73adef0fd480
> filled with energy inherent to space itself,
> expanding at a constant, exponential rate,
> and creating new space so quickly that the smallest physical length scale, the Planck length, would be stretched to the size of the presently observable Universe every 10^―32 seconds."
Similar threads
- Locked
