- 64,125
- 16,109
Rather simple AP and Dura upgrade based on some updated calcs that would bump all of Volume 1-3 to High 8-C
Also a lifting strength upgrade for Glynda
Discuss
Also a lifting strength upgrade for Glynda
Discuss
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The math is based off of a few other currently accepted shockwave calcs that all us the same methodI might be mistaken about this calc: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:WeeklyBattles/RWBY:_Yang_and_Arslan_Punch_Hard
But wouldn't the assumptions here mean that they're got rid of all of the air inside the arena and turned it into a vacuum? That doesn't seem right for just a shockwave calc.
Bruh....Ah, frig, there goes my planned Yang vs Tifa match >_>;
Thats ******* weird, wtf is with these profilesIt was Vols 4-8 that were High 8-C not Vols 1-3.
Yeah but its no big deal now. I'm far more concerned with the state of current stuff.I mean they didn't have any High 8-C calcs to scale to, the only High 8-C calc until now came from Yatsuhashi to my knowledge.
The rest of their feats were some 9-A+, and lots of 8-C to 8-C+.
What do you mean? Did I miss something during all this time?
Its funny, i actually found a bunch more 8-C/8-C+ feats but didnt bother posting them as theyre bit feats lolI mean they didn't have any High 8-C calcs to scale to, the only High 8-C calc until now came from Yatsuhashi to my knowledge.
The rest of their feats were some 9-A+, and lots of 8-C to 8-C+.
What do you mean? Did I miss something during all this time?
1:56
But just because they function like guns doesn't mean they'd have similar speeds. Its not like they are firing normal bullets anyway. You are free to make that assumption but don't think its all that valid.I mean we can just us the speed of a bullet as a comparison seing as its a gun lol
I don't know if I'd describe something as "best" when its even necessarily likely. But I digress lets move on.It’s the best assumption we have until we find something more concrete
I suppose notI'll have the calcgroup look at it and do it later
I thik we hav enough agreement to apply this but are there any more opinions on this revision?
Hopefully the 8-A goes through, it'd pretty much be blasphemy otherwise.Long story short it would likely solidly bump volume 6-7 up to 8-B if the 8-A stuff didnt go through