- 34,605
- 35,060
As far as I'm concerned, that does count as a rule violation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I meant some examples, but thank you for your reply.Instigating drama (be respectful), harassment (be kind), spite edits (vandalism).
Apparently also plagiarism (under 'explaining statistics').
That seems fine to me as well then.Month seems fine. Since I made one of the reports I'd prefer one other voice aside from mine on the subject, though. For fairness' sake.
Hmm. It doesn't seem like there was any intentional rule-violation or malicious intent involved. Would a warning be sufficient?@Makai641001 Sent me some DMs indicating that he broke our rule on asking authors battleboarding questions.
That would probably be fine.Hmm. It doesn't seem like there was any intentional rule-violation or malicious intent involved. Would a warning be sufficient?![]()
we'll have to rewrite the reason this discussion rule exists.
I agree with Code regarding discussion rule.
Should we then simply change the rule like this?Due to it's issues leading to misinterpretation of the source material, the use of human-edited machine translation (edited-MTL) content within this verse (both WN and LN) is strictly prohibited unless they are verified by one of the official Translation Helpers (TLs) or a user with proven fluency in Japanese. However, exceptions may be made for human-edited MTLs originating from well-regarded and trusted sources that show no signs of intentional misrepresentation or manipulation, such as Slime Reader. Any future CRTs or profile changes that use unverified human-edited MTLs will be considered invalid and subject to reversal.
Looks good but A thread will be required regardless for other staffs to judge the rewrite, I think.Should we then simply change the rule like this?
I think we can apply the ban nowSounds good to me.
I agree. Dude is toasted for a month, added to the tracker.I think we can apply the ban now
I've added a warning for Makai to the tracker.Is somebody willing to apply it please?![]()
So what about this? Should we discuss it in our current staff forum thread about machine translations?Should we then simply change the rule like this?
This should go hereReporting Saxeee for making three troll edits on the profiles for Dexter Morgan, MCU Thanos, and Anissa (TV Series), respectively
Oops, my bad. I'll go and forward it thereThis should go here
https://vsbattles.com/threads/wiki-vandalism-reports.163273
I give them a short block since it was after a final warning.![]()
Wiki Vandalism Reports
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Chronos_(Saint_Seiya)?oldid=9135224 Page was edited without crt. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Grag246vsbattles.com
guy keeps making edits despite being given a final warning
![]()
Louis961
vsbattles.fandom.com
Not to derail here, but I was wondering if it's possible to restore his Calculation Group and Thread Moderator privileges as well. Also, would it be possible to give Chariot190 his Calculation Group privileges as well?Hello.
This is an information message regarding that our higher ranked staff members decided in private that @Vzearr seems harmless and genuinely regretful for his offences, and that he went to extremes trying to help out in our community, so I have unblocked him after an almost 4 months long ban.
Please try to be nice and forgiving to him.![]()
I do not think it is appropriate to ask questions like that publicly. But it is kind of a common knowledge thing; if people were demoted and/or banned for pretty good reasons, that already basically makes it very difficult and highly unlikely we'd be giving them any sort of staff positions back.Not to derail here, but I was wondering if it's possible to restore his Calculation Group and Thread Moderator privileges as well. Also, would it be possible to give Chariot190 his Calculation Group privileges as well?
Just trying to vouch for them.
Yes, such comments are not appreciated, but this doesn't mean you can humiliate someone just because they said something like that.Crazy how tensura haters won in that argument with all the points you've said regarding this thing
Here blames @ZERGESS for a thread that was created before he/she joined the forum and has nothing to do with him/her.“Haters”? Which side made a spite thread to remove abilities when the only thread made by the “Haters” (at that point in time) was the removable of NEP for veldanava and Rimuru’s HGR (which was warranted because of the flawed argument) again?
Seriously, you people love to play the victim, dont you?
question, who bringing this matter ? they clearly talking about the world and dimension, yet you shot it with ability ? wtf ?.
Read. I’m addressing his/her/idk blatant lies about the opposition being merely just “haters” lol (your side did worse btw) . Reading comprehension is rare these days huh?
Although I didn’t want to comment on this considering it’s absolutely pointless, I cannot stand hypocrisy and blatant lies.
their, alr i apologize for this misunderstanding. but still doesn't hide the fact you shot for different context.
I’m seriously questioning whether this supporter base passed 5th grade.
I didn’t “shot”, as you so badly put it, for different context. I called them out for acting like the victim when the side they’re siding with has made blatant spite threads. That’s why I brought up the thread trying to remove abilities. Again, READ.
Yeah no. I wasn’t “humiliating” them at all. If you actually read my replies, (xept for the ones where I was obviously not quite cool headed) you would know I wasn’t insulting them at all. In fact, when they asked me what was wrong with their grammar, I answered them straight without any sarcastic remarks/malicious comments.I am reporting @TheResonanceGuy123 for comments which I quoted below (staff should read from here on)
This comment from @ZERGESS starts the discussion.
Yes, such comments are not appreciated, but this doesn't mean you can humiliate someone just because they said something like that.
What? Where in that comment did I blame them? I only specifically said that they shouldn’t invalidate a thread by simply saying that it was made by “haters”. Nowhere did I say they were part of the ones who made the thread.First comment from @TheResonanceGuy123
Here blames @ZERGESS for a thread that was created before he/she joined the forum and has nothing to do with him/her.
Telling them to read is NOT an insultThen gets a reply from @Anvilndo28
And then insults @Anvilndo28 for some seemingly irrelevant or self-made reason.
Yep, thanks for proving that they misunderstood my comment. Sure I may have some wrongs here, but you cant hold that against me because I was simply frustrated that they misunderstood my point when I obviously meant something else.After then gets a second reply from @Anvilndo28
Now this, I don’t have an explanation for. In fact, it’s pretty clear that it is indeed, an insult. And for that I apologize. I just got a little pissed off because the ones who replied to me (xept lycoris) misunderstood my point and made it seem like it was unreasonable. I have stated multiple times in the thread that I wouldn’t reply further. But of course, frustration got the better of me and so I said what i said. Again, I apologize. But I won’t stand here and act like I’m the only one in the wrong when they completely misunderstood my comment.And insults again and acts as if all Tensei Shitara Slime Datta Ken supporters are responsible for this so called spite thread (whether this thread will be considered as a spite or not is a decision to be made by the staff, unless OP has been previously reported).
Where in that comment did I blame them?
In the Tensei Shitara Slime Datta Ken general discussion thread, you ask which side made a spite thread. I'm supposed to be thinking about who you're blaming? If it's just OP of thread, then you shouldn't have used the word "side."Which side made a spite thread to remove abilities
Telling them to read is NOT an insult
Reading comprehension is rare these days huh?
Yes, you definitely told "just read", lol.I’m seriously questioning whether this supporter base passed 5th grade![]()
You admit you did some wrongs but you say I can't hold that against you? Anyway, I don't care. Already, at most you'll get a formal warning.Sure I may have some wrongs here, but you cant hold that against me
It wasn’t just one, it was multiple. Just check the vote tally.In the Tensei Shitara Slime Datta Ken general discussion thread, you ask which side made a spite thread. I'm supposed to be thinking about who you're blaming? If it's just OP of thread, then you shouldn't have used the word "side."
Especially when the one in question misunderstood what I said, hence why they apologized and said they misunderstood my comment. Sure I said some sarcastic stuff about Reading comprehension, but that was seriously warranted considering they literally did not understand what I said and neither did you. - What I said after that.Yes, you definitely told "just read", lol.
You read my comment, and then that’s the conclusion you made? Anyway, this will be my last comment. I’m tired and I need some sleep, I will deal with whatever consequence the mods have for me later.You admit you did some wrongs but you say I can't hold that against you? Anyway, I don't care. Already, at most you'll get a formal warning.
i am indeed misunderstood your comment about "haters side" but not about my initial claim where still exist, which bringing "irrelevant things" to the argument itself. don't butcher my words for your own advantage.misunderstood my comment
Indeed. I doubt it even needs to be discussed.Alright, i can't let this slide
This behavior clearly warrants a ban at this point. Not only have they repeatedly created troll tier 0 profiles, but their response to the warning was also completely inappropriate.![]()
Proeka23456
vsbattles.fandom.com
Yeah, I’m fine with that.A warning for @TheResonanceGuy123 is probably sufficient provided they agree to stop the aggressive, accusatory attitude moving forward.
That seems fine to me. Is somebody willing to apply it, including updating our warning tracker, please?A warning for @TheResonanceGuy123 is probably sufficient provided they agree to stop the aggressive, accusatory attitude moving forward.
I handled it.Alright, i can't let this slide
This behavior clearly warrants a ban at this point. Not only have they repeatedly created troll tier 0 profiles, but their response to the warning was also completely inappropriate.![]()
Proeka23456
vsbattles.fandom.com
Sure. I'll give a warning and then add it to the tracker.That seems fine to me. Is somebody willing to apply it, including updating our warning tracker, please?![]()