Rule clarification for High 1-A+

[OMNIVERSAL-KING]

I have following questions regarding this new high 1-A+ tier
1) is it necessary to have an outerversal or higher Cosmology for high 1-A+ ?
2) Is "a character can do anything" stuff with context that it isn't just metaphorical but it really refers to "everything is possible for that character" or "it can do anything that's possible, even illogical one" enough for high 1-A+ (just like tier 0 is "Omnipotence" that can be actually proved) . Or in other words is being stated to have "unlimited capabilities" with enough proof of it being "literal" instead of metaphorical high 1-A+ ?
3) If a character has all qualities of a tier 0 character accept for any one, then is that character automatically high 1-A+

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

1) Technically you just need proof your possibilities go up to a High 1-A+ extent. You don't need your cosmology to first have a 1-A or higher cosmology first and then be revealed to have High 1-A+, you just need proof of High 1-A+
2) Depends on how it's described. "Can do anything" by itself wouldn't be enough. But with enough evidence and examples of what they can do, it can be. Also Tier 0 is fundamentally based on logically possible Omnipotence, so if a character can do something logically impossible like bypassing the Omni Paradox or creating a square circle , it'd get ignored and lowballed to only include logical possibilities. For example, "The answer to 'Can God do X ?' is always Yes" , or comparable concepts, technically would include logically impossible things unless you put a specific caveat that says as long as it's logically possible, but we would ignore that and assume it only includes logical possibilities. The same thing would happen with Extended Modal Realism
3) A monad who is contradicted from what I remember being said by Ultima can be any tier. You'd need proof they're at a High 1-A+ level if a monad's nature was contradicted

 

[OMNIVERSAL-KING]

1) Technically you just need proof your possibilities go up to a High 1-A+ extent. You don't need your cosmology to first have a 1-A or higher cosmology first and then be revealed to have High 1-A+, you just need proof of High 1-A+
2) Depends on how it's described. "Can do anything" by itself wouldn't be enough. But with enough evidence and examples of what they can do, it can be. Also Tier 0 is fundamentally based on logically possible Omnipotence, so if a character can do something logically impossible like bypassing the Omni Paradox or creating a square circle , it'd get ignored and lowballed to only include logical possibilities. For example, "The answer to 'Can God do X ?' is always Yes" , or comparable concepts, technically would include logically impossible things unless you put a specific caveat that says as long as it's logically possible, but we would ignore that and assume it only includes logical possibilities. The same thing would happen with Extended Modal Realism
3) A monad who is contradicted from what I remember being said by Ultima can be any tier. You'd need proof they're at a High 1-A+ level if a monad's nature was contradicted

Thanks for reply , just one thing left , is being stated to have "unlimited capabilities" with enough proof of it being "literal" instead of metaphorical high 1-A+ ?

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

That would depend on how literal it's made out to be. If it's the most literal and/or broadest/maximal sense , then likely it'd be a yes,but keep in mind most fictional concepts and stories don't take the concept that far, so the odds of that are pretty slim.