• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Removing a singular calc from Spongebob's profile

8,931
10,116
spinchbub :(((((((

Spongebob reacts to a radio wave.
This calc is absurd. I don't need to go in-depth as @Agnaa already explained it pretty well as to why the calc can't be used:
Why was this accepted? That "radio wave" is absurdly unrealistic.

Do you think that the laser/light dodging feats can be bypassed just because it's a different wavelength?

A tuning fork creating four lines when banged, which bounce off a brain, and turn a snail into dozens of tiny copies, is not realistic at all.

This meets zero of our standards for light, and fails one of our criteria (it doesn't travel in a straight line when curving back towards Gary).
As pointed out, besides the radio wave being unrealistic, it doesn't follow our standards for light-based attacks.
  • The beam refracts in a new material, such as a liquid or...
  • The beam diffuses in a reasonably realistic way or reflects off a material that it can be expected to, such as a non-magical mirror.
  • The beam is called lightspeed by reliable sources.
  • It is stated to be composed/consisting of photons or light itself, again by a reliable source.
  • It has its origin at a realistic source of light, such as a camera.
It's also a false laser/light feat for these reasons:
  • It is tangible and can be interacted with physically by normal humans.
  • They do not travel in straight lines
Get it outta here.
 
I agree with removing it, unless there is consistent proof that it does follow our laser/light standards.
 
Back
Top