Reaction and Perception

[Skhoaa810]

i don't know if anyone has discussed this topic yet.

Reactions and Perceptions

In fiction, movement over long distances and movement over short distances - which can be dubbed "combat distances" - tend to be remarkably different for different characters, resulting in serious discrepancies when considering their overall speed. On this wiki, we therefore differentiate...

vsbattles.fandom.com

i mean this is actually a reaction speed time frame, not a perception speed time frame.

explain how the eye works:

the human eye sends about 60 frames per second (fps) to the brain, which combines these images to create a smooth and continuous visual experience.

formula 1/speed here is 1m to assume that when out of percep the character will be immobile and unable to move.

to explain it easily, I will take the speed of light as an example.

char A has the speed of light moving in the time frame 0.000000003336s AkA 1/299792450 char B out reaction/blizt makes char A immobile and unable to move any further, then the distance char B moves also moves in the time frame 0.000000003336s if char B does not move in this time frame then character A has moved more than 1m.

basically the real speed of perception is faster than this but at the same using this time frame for out reaction/perception is completely reasonable.

LoL

Agrre :
Neutral :
Disagree :

 

[Skhoaa810]

this thread just confirms that i'm not a newbie because yesterday's Naruto debunk thread was closed for no reason i think people think i'm not capable of doing it, anyway if this thread isn't enough to prove my level then the next thread will be debunk pytago formula

 

[Skhoaa810]

@CloverDragon03 @DemonGodMitchAubin
please check this thread!!! <>

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

this thread just confirms that i'm not a newbie because yesterday's Naruto debunk thread was closed for no reason i think people think i'm not capable of doing it, anyway if this thread isn't enough to prove my level then the next thread will be debunk pytago formula and angsize of vsbw.

No, it was closed because you don't properly chose anything to "debunk", you just asked people to give calculations to you, and that's not how it works, well, at least here. Beyond that, the only calculation that you tried to argue that was incorrect ins't used on our profiles at all

In short: It was closed because the thread didn't had any purpose on it's original post and tried to remove from the profiles a calc..... That is not even currently used on the profiles

 

[Skhoaa810]

I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
btw how i can create a thread to check all Naruto FTL calcs?

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
btw how i can create a thread to check all Naruto FTL calcs?

I don't recommend you talking about all the calcs in a single thread, since it makes the CRT messed up

You can check the currently used calculations by acessing the Verse page:

Naruto (Verse)

For detailed information about the series, see the Naruto Wiki The plot follows Naruto Uzumaki, a young ninja who desires recognition from his peers and aspires to become the Hokage, the village's chief. Naruto is assigned, alongside his rival Sasuke Uchiha and a teenage crush Sakura Haruno, to...

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Skhoaa810]

dead.

 

[Vzearr]

You need to give sources for your claims.

 

[Skhoaa810]

i edited it. btw what do u think about this thread?

You need to give sources for your claims.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

this thread just confirms that i'm not a newbie because yesterday's Naruto debunk thread was closed for no reason i think people think i'm not capable of doing it, anyway if this thread isn't enough to prove my level then the next thread will be debunk pytago formula and angsize of vsbw.

It has absolutely nothing to do with you being a "newbie" or thinking you're incapable. It was closed because you didn't brought any point. You don't "debunk feats" on a calc group thread. These threads are for discussing calcs mathematically (whether the method used is correct, for example) the dispute behind feats legitimacy is for CRTs, and your threads were completely empty in that regard.

What you seek is not a Calc Group discussion, but general discussion to disguise CRTs (whether intended as them or not).

As for this thread in particular, it at least tries to discuss a point among our calculations after you edited the OP, so it reaches the bare minimum for it to not be closed.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Now, to address OP directly:
First and foremost, I suggest you read our Discussion Rules to get acquainted with how we operate on this site (alongside the site rules themselves of course).

You will notice we have the following rule:

Before making a thread, first check if the topic has been handled previously.

By checking our tags, you will find this particular topic has already been discussed. With greater evidence and thoroughness than what is attempted here.

You brought a single article to discuss our standards, so I may be a little skeptical in your knowledge regarding this area.

Nevertheless, I will tag a couple calc group members for you, if they are interested in discussing this with you: @Armorchompy @Agnaa @SeijiSetto @DontTalkDT

 

[DontTalkDT]

Yeah, I don't think there is anything to say here that hasn't already been said in the prior discussions on the topic.

 

[Skhoaa810]

Yeah, I don't think there is anything to say here that hasn't already been said in the prior discussions on the topic.

I have only joined vsbw for 2 days so I did not know about these discussion topics before.

 

[Popbum]

Isn’t this calc stacking?

 

[Skhoaa810]

Isn’t this calc stacking?

i don't think so.

 

[DontTalkDT]

I have only joined vsbw for 2 days so I did not know about these discussion topics before.

No problem.
LephyrTheRevanchist has linked the past threads in his last comment. Can this thread be closed or are there remaining suggestions after reading the threads in question?

 

[Floxy178]

then the next thread will be debunk pytago formula

No, I'll do it

 

[Skhoaa810]

Can this thread be closed or are there remaining suggestions after reading the threads in question?

ok