Questions about destroying a universe

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

here are some of my questions when destroying a universe


1. Does it depend on the material that makes up the universe. (like what if the universe is made up of a weak energy. So someone did destroy it but it's really weak like paper. since the energy is as weak as paper, the material not metaphor.)

2. What if someone did destroy a universe but the universe is made up of different energy than ours and it just so happens to be weak to people from the normal universe aka our universe. so while people can destroy that universe, they can't destroy ours.

3. Does it depend on the way it's destroyed. (kinda like how diamonds can't be destroyed via scratching but hitting it will destroy it)

 

[Planck69]

Are you talking about the physical matter of the universe or the space-time continuum?

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

Are you talking about the physical matter of the universe or the space-time continuum?

i guess both. although you could try three answers.

as in first answer in the case of physical matter.

second answer in Space time.

third answer both.

 

[Planck69]

In regards to it being space-time, the 1 and 2 make no sense. If it's physical matter then I don't know, this is too weirdly specific. At the very least, if the people that destroy the universe are normal humans then that universe is only 10-B in durability (I think?)

3. If it's space time, as long as it's by one's own power, it usually doesn't matter how you destroy a universe (blasting it, transmuting it etc.)

 

[Deonment]

From what I know
1. If you mean that the matter that makes up the universe is different and could have a higher or lower joule requirement to destroy it, them yes but it would have to be shown

2. What if someone did destroy a universe but the universe is made up of different energy than ours and it just so happens to be weak to people from the normal universe aka our universe. so while people can destroy that universe, they can't destroy ours

2. You answered your own question
3.kinda, depending on the method cause vaporising and using an explosion will get different results

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I don't think there's any examples of universe being made of materials many times weaker than normal matter being made literal. But we calculate 3-A feats using inverse square law if they oneshot it outright. The 2 second point makes no sense tbh, but if it's a space-time continuum being destroyed, it's Low 2-C outright.

Destruction methods do matter sometimes; there are standard assumptions for 3-A vs Low 2-C. We usually consider universe busting feats via explosions or physical strikes 3-A unless it specifically says all time an space is being destroyed. But "causing the dimensional collapse of an entire universe"; the term "Dimensional" is strong implications of referring to spatial shenanigans and we'd consider that Low 2-C if it's backed up as "Being the entire universe".

Though, for 3-A feats, it's more so one-shotting the observable universe via an omnidirectional explosion outright is the baseline for 3-A. Destroying the universe one planet or star at a time would be much lower than that for obvious reasons. For space-time continuums, it's difficult to divide, so even if it isn't instant destroying a timeline with your own power would still be Low 2-C.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

I don't think there's any examples of universe being made of materials many times weaker than normal matter being made literal. But we calculate 3-A feats using inverse square law if they oneshot it outright. The 2 second point makes no sense tbh, but if it's a space-time continuum being destroyed, it's Low 2-C outright.

Destruction methods do matter sometimes; there are standard assumptions for 3-A vs Low 2-C. We usually consider universe busting feats via explosions or physical strikes 3-A unless it specifically says all time an space is being destroyed. But "causing the dimensional collapse of an entire universe"; the term "Dimensional" is strong implications of referring to spatial shenanigans and we'd consider that Low 2-C if it's backed up as "Being the entire universe".

Though, for 3-A feats, it's more so one-shotting the observable universe via an omnidirectional explosion outright is the baseline for 3-A. Destroying the universe one planet or star at a time would be much lower than that for obvious reasons. For space-time continuums, it's difficult to divide, so even if it isn't instant destroying a timeline with your own power would still be Low 2-C.

thank you. 2nd question essentially meant.

another universe is made up of different energy than ours so it requires different material to destroy it.

it's like if another universe was made up of anti matter. and i just went into it. and destroyed it just by my presence because i'm made of regular matter. (in this scenario just assume i don't get destroyed as well)

but i can't destroy a regular universe. (i was only able to destroy that universe because it's properties were different than the properties of our universe)

 

[SheevShezarrine]

thank you. 2nd question essentially meant.

another universe is made up of different energy than ours so it requires different material to destroy it.

it's like if another universe was made up of anti matter. and i just went into it. and destroyed it just by my presence because i'm made of regular matter. (in this scenario just assume i don't get destroyed as well)

but i can't destroy a regular universe. (i was only able to destroy that universe because it's properties were different than the properties of our universe)

Destroying an antimatter universe by being comprised of matter would be durability negation and also be situational, so it wouldn't really apply to AP. Surviving it tho would be pretty impressive, since you're at the epicenter of it it would grant universe level durability, if it's just one singular explosion that wipes out the universe.

 

[Planck69]

Technically speaking, you wouldn't really destroy the universe of you were made of antimatter.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

i'm also curious what would happen if a normal person crushed a tiny universe in his hand but he's in a normal universe.

Like i'm living in the real world inside a universe but i'm holding a tiny universe that i then crush. does it count as universe level stuff or what.

 

[FinePoint]

i'm also curious what would happen if a normal person crushed a tiny universe in his hand but he's in a normal universe.

Like i'm living in the real world inside a universe but i'm holding a tiny universe that i then crush. does it count as universe level stuff or what.

Usually it depends on perspective. If the series is typically written from the perspective of the people inside the small universe, then it might be a 3-A or Low 2-C feat, but if the perspective is normally focused on the larger universe, then it might just be assumed that universe is a 10-C or 11-A structure.