• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about cosmology

160
9
I have a few questions about Aleph after I read the tiering system.

  • There are an infinite number of 4D universes where each universe will produce branches but only one universe
  • The second explanation is similar to the previous explanation, there are an infinite number of universes but each universe no longer only produces one universe but each universe will produce an infinite number of other universes.

Which of these explanations agrees with how to derive the Aleph-1 (inf^inf) cosmology? or even neither, if so, why?
 
First one is still Aleph-0. Because it will only be Aleph-0 + Aleph-0.

And if what you mean in the second statement is that there is only infinite branching from infinite universes and it is only a one time thing, then it is still Aleph-0. Because it would be Aleph-0 x Aleph-0, which is still Aleph-0. To get from this kind of thing to Aleph-1, this infinite universe has to branch out into infinite universes and so on infinitely. Because this would be Aleph-0 repetition of "Aleph-0 x Aleph-0" and the result would be Aleph-1 according to CH
 
Back
Top