Qeustion with type 3 concept

[Lapsad]

Due to type 3 , concept = reallity then no one more fundamental than other right ?

 

[GreatIskandar14045]

Nah, not really. Let me make it simple.

A concept is not a reality, it is an abstract idea.
Type 3 is where the concept exists universally and governs objects, for example, the concept of square would represent the entire shape of square on the reality, and nuking everything related to said squares would stop that concept from existing as well.

Type 4 concepts are made by perceptions and had nothing to do with this "governing" stuffs. While type 2 is transcendent, completely independent from the objects.

It's often misinterpreted as "reality" because the page description can just be misleading.

 

[Lapsad]

I know concept is ideal but what was i asking is type 3 , abstract ideal equal to reallity in term of fundamentality such on high-godly page erase ones on conceptual level would give high-godly cuz concept are more fundamental than reallity , but what i think is difference.

Another type i knew what they are.

 

[GreatIskandar14045]

I know concept is ideal but what was i asking is type 3 , abstract ideal equal to reallity in term of fundamentality such on high-godly page erase ones on conceptual level would give high-godly cuz concept are more fundamental than reallity , but what i think is difference.

Another type i knew what they are.

You mean, type 3 concept is deeper than reality? The set of type 3 concepts is what makes the reality as far as I know, they should be on the same level fundamentality.

 

[Lapsad]

Yeah it's what i mean , and i think that concept isn't deeper than reallity.

 

[GreatIskandar14045]

Yeah it's what i mean , and i think that concept isn't deeper than reallity.

Yeah type 3 concepts are the part of reality itself.

 

[Bernkastelll]

Yeah it's what i mean , and i think that concept isn't deeper than reallity.

It would be something like this

 

[Lapsad]

Yeah type 3 concept = reallity , type 2 concept > reallity.

 

[Lapsad]

If type 3 isn't deeper than reallity then it shouldn't given high-godly and nep type 2 ?

 

[Fixxed]

If type isn't deeper than reallity then it shouldn't given high-godly or nep type 2 ?

That's different case

 

[Lapsad]

What diff ?

 

[Rez]

If type isn't deeper than reallity then it shouldn't given high-godly or nep type 2 ?

High godly is being capable of Regenerating from conceptual ee and nep type 2 is lacking everything at an conceptual level

 

[Lapsad]

High godly is being capable of Regenerating from conceptual ee and nep type 2 is lacking everything at an conceptual level

But type 3 isn't deeper or fundamentally than reallity , high-godly you need to erase foundation of person type 3 seem not like that.

Also nep type 2 , just erased on type 3 level aren't difference from erase person with normal EE.