Profile Additional Revamps for Higher Tiers

[VeryGoofyToddler2]

The purpose for this thread was actually brought up by a member and I can not lie it was a rather good suggestion. I've talked with @Antvasima about this whom let me do this.

Due to recent revamping in the tiering system, its rather ambiguous and hard to differentiate beings in the same category, that's not counting High 1-A+ and 0 since all beings scaling there are more or less equal.

So here are the necessary suggestions and changes that need to be implemented.

Higher Infinity:​

Low 1-C:​

Low 1-C is defined as:

Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy higher-dimensional structures that are one uncountably infinite level above Low 2-C structures. In ordinary distribution, this corresponds to R^5 (5-dimensional real coordinate space).

Nothing really too much to change here, but an added bonus of just including (5D) to the attack potency area.

For example: Thor was recently added as Low 1-C due to scaling to realms that are 5-dimensional in nature. So for his attack potency justification, we’ll just add the standard bolded “Low Complex Multiverse level” followed by a parenthesis indicating (5-D) then the reasoning and supporting statement after that.

1-C:​

1-C is defined as:

Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy higher-dimensional structures that are two to five uncountably infinite levels above Low 2-C structures. In ordinary distribution, this corresponds to R^6 to R^9 (6 to 9-dimensional real coordinate space).

Now, this is where it gets interesting. While 1-C starts at 6-dimensional space it also goes up to 9-dimensional space. Obviously, the justifications usually tells us why certain characters or places get this tier. However, I think it'd be easier and a lot more convenient to add where they scale since scaling two different characters from two different fiction is rather difficult because the setting and context differ.

So like Low 1-C, we add where they correspond within 1-C as such; (6D), (7D), (8D), (9D)

For example, while Uminkeo is under revision, Jessica Ushiromiya is listed at one of her keys as 1-C to High 1-C which is a big jump and an obvious status of her dimensionality would matter.

For the next two tiers, I'm not going to go over too much since the application from the above tiers apply to them.

Spoiler: High 1-C and 1-B

High 1-C​

High 1-C is defined as:

Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy higher-dimensional structures that are six to seven uncountably infinite levels above Low 2-C structures. In ordinary distribution, this corresponds to R^10 to R^11 (10 to 11-dimensional real coordinate space).

1-B:​

1-B is defined as:

Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy higher-dimensional structures that are eight to any higher finite number of uncountably infinite levels above Low 2-C structures (12-dimensional real coordinate space, in ordinary distribution), up to any higher finite number of dimensions.

Same as above. All that's needed is to define which dimensionality of a certain characters, place, weapon, or civilization scale to.

High 1-B:​

High 1-B category(including the “+” modifier) is defined as:

Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy infinite-dimensional space. Characters who can meddle with spaces with uncountably infinite or above dimensions should have a "+" modifier in their Attack Potency section (High Hyperverse level+).

This is where it gets rather interesting. We know that we define this tier in terms of quantitative measure on the degrees of infinity.

For beings that scale to this tier would get a different. For the standard notion of just the baseline level of infinite spatial dimensions, we can just put (Infinite-D*0) and it goes on infinitely(Infinite-D*∞).

For beings that scale to the uncountable side, we can denote them as (Uncountable-D*0), and it goes on infinitely as well (Uncountable-D*∞).

So that's each layer of countable or uncountable would associate with the latter portion which measures at the endpoint of the quantitative numbers.

Low 1-A:​

Low 1-A is defined as:

Characters whose power is on the level of the Von Neumann Universe. That is, they either encompass, or can affect structures which encompass, the collection including all possible dimensional spaces.

As a general rule-of-thumb, statements of being "above dimensions" and the like, whenever validly indicating a superiority over higher dimensions, fall under this tier without further context. See here for more information.

This one is rather tricky since it talks rather about structuring around any dimensional sets or being able to affect them.

So, for this tier, we can just say (All dimensional) for a structure containing any set application and perhaps some axioms. Though, that's only if the case is vague, if it does invoke any names to grant that such as “Von Neumann Universe” then put that instead of any anything inline with the notion of a space of sets such as the example being Universe of Sets. As such read this.

Spoiler: Low 1-A+ Addition

I've argued with @Agnaa about this and personally, I feel its a must since anything above High 1-B should have some sort of “+” modifier. This will encompass Tegmark Type IV Multiverse(watered down) and any larger conglomerate containing all possible sets.

1-A:​

1-A category(including the “+” modifier) is defined as:

Characters or objects residing in higher states of existence surpassing material composition as a whole, and who are therefore completely unreachable and inaccessible to any and all extensions of the aforementioned structures. Their superiority over such realms, as such, is purely "qualitative"; based entirely on the ontological quality and nature of their existence, rather than any quantitative or numerical principle.

A way to explain their superiority over "physical composition" would be to bring attention to the fact that all of the previous tiers can be expressed as the union of constructs of lower tiers. For example, a 4-dimensional spacetime continuum is at most Low 2-C. However, an inaccessible cardinal's worth of such spacetimes is well into High 1-B+. In spite of the extremely large gap in size between the individuals comprising this totality and the totality itself, the latter is simply the sum of all the former, and as such both ultimately reside in the same state of existence, and have continuity of composition within that state.

Likewise, even the Von Neumann Universe (As well as larger structures still) is still simply the union of many elements that, individually, are smaller than itself. And the same applies to any mathematical space whatsoever.

For this tier, we can break down into some of the nuances. If the wether by conceptual transcendence or R>F, if it's just baseline then we use (baseline). For any additional layer (One layer-infinite layer).

For the “+” modifier from countable to the uncountable layers, we can use (Infinite layer-Uncountable layer)

High 1-A:​

High 1-A category(including the “+” modifier) is defined as:

Characters or objects who transcend 1-A characters in the same vein that 1-A characters transcend the rest of the system. That is to say: If there is a hierarchy of 1-A layers, each of which operates within the same framework, with the same "algorithm" dictating the difference between them, a High 1-A character would transcend the framework entirely, and instead operate on a different, higher hierarchy, governed by another, likewise higher algorithm. In other words, whereas 1-A is a qualitative superiority, High 1-Arepresents a "meta"-qualitative superiority.

Similarly to 1-A, this tier can be generalized to higher levels of existence. Just as 1-A encompasses qualitative hierarchies, so too can there be meta-qualitative hierarchies. In addition, there can also be "meta"-meta-qualitative superiorities, and so forth, endlessly.

The apex of this tier, represented also by a "+" modifier in their Attack Potency section (High Outerverse level+), corresponds to characters whose power encompasses meta-qualities, meta-meta-qualities, and any and all conceivable extensions of this process, being on a which in which their power influences the space of all logically possible worlds ("Logical space," where the laws governing it are the three laws of thought), being characters who either have the ability to actualize arbitrarily large worlds, or embody the framework of such worlds itself.

That said, characters who embody the framework of all possible worlds properly speaking may be rightly considered more powerful than those that can simply create arbitrarily big possible worlds while nevertheless existing in one.

The same as before with 1-A to 1-A+. Which corresponds as (Baseline), (One layer-Infinite layer), (infinite layer-uncountable layer)

However, for the “+” modifier, it's rather easy to just (Type 1) or (Type 2). I can offer another suggestion which is just a slightly differ Type 1 while we keep it we also add a hyphen to indicate how many worlds are being counted. So (Type 1-One world-finite worlds).