• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

High 1-A Hierarchies?

Messages
69
Reaction score
20
Basically: If High 1-A hierarchies of "meta"-qualitative superiority can exist, how does each of the hierarchy's layer transcend the one below? If each layer is "meta"-qualitatively superior, then it would operate on a higher hierarchy, and so there would be no hierarchy in the beginning, no?

Likewise, how can there be "meta"-"meta"-qualitative superiorities and so forth, then? Is it meta-qualitative superiority over meta-qualitative superiority, or something much higher?
 
Basically: If High 1-A hierarchies of "meta"-qualitative superiority can exist, how does each of the hierarchy's layer transcend the one below? If each layer is "meta"-qualitatively superior, then it would operate on a higher hierarchy, and so there would be no hierarchy in the beginning, no?
I think each layer would have the same gap as a High 1-A baseline has to a Non 1-A[not even 1-A]
Consider the following
In order to get High 1-A, the character must exceed the framework of the lower levels entirely, and not simply be at the top of an existing lower hierarchy or simply transcend a Hierarchy of Infinite Reality>Fiction Transcendences 1-A+). For instance, if in a verse there is a Hierarchy of Infinite (or even a non-Infinite number) Levels of Qualitative Superiorities (A Reality-Fiction hierarchy, for instance), with each level seeing the one below as completely Fictional, then simply existing at the top, of say, the "Infinity-th" level on that Hierarchy will not qualify for this tier, as such as character is still within the Logical Framework defining that Hierarchy. In the same vein, simply qualitatively transcending this Hierarchy, while working on a higher Hierarchy of Qualitative Superiorities that still works on the same notion/level of Reality/Fiction transcendences as the first hierarchy, would not qualify for this either. This is essentially because, while the character indeed functions on a higher Hierarchy, they still possess the same common Genus/Quality that exists in all Reality-Fiction levels of a higher Hierarchy, as them being on a higher hierarchy simply means their Non-Common Genus is of a higher level. For example, an amount of Aleph-1 or higher layers of Reality-Fiction transcendences technically means that the Aleph-1-th Layer is something above the Infinite Hierarchy from 0 to Aleph-Null, however, that does not change the fact that if we simply add another level on top of the Aleph-Null Hierarchy, we will indeed reach Aleph-1 in terms of standing, and the same goes for all Possible amounts of 1-A Layers .Therefore, a High 1-A character must transcend All Possible Levels of 1-A Hierarchies entirely, and not just be a level above the Infinite Layers. This, of course, also includes transcendence over all mathematically possible amount of Reality fiction layers,

One way to achieve this tier is to lack the very distinction between Non 1-A and 1-A (Baseline or Higher). To elaborate, we must know that that each layer of 1-A (even above 1-A+) has the same difference between itself and the lower layer as the difference Baseline 1-A has with Non 1-A. So to say, the Common Genus of All 1-A Hierarchies is also the very Quality distinguishing Non 1-A from 1-A. Thus, if someone lacks and/or transcends the very distinction between Non 1-A and 1-A, they are essentially transcending the very Quality dictating the 1-A Framework, thus achieving a High 1-A rating. A common example in fiction are Monad-like Entities that encompass both Non 1-A and 1-A Layers, or even any two 1-A Layers, and are thus valid examples of High 1-A lack the Quality that defines the 1-A Framework, unless shown otherwise via Anti-Feats
Likewise, how can there be "meta"-"meta"-qualitative superiorities and so forth, then? Is it meta-qualitative superiority over meta-qualitative superiority, or something much higher?
Basically, yeah. A Meta-meta qualitative superiority would be practically be something that transcends all Meta-qualitative extensions above baseline High 1-A, the same way High 1-A transcends 1-A.
 
I think each layer would have the same gap as a High 1-A baseline has to a Non 1-A[not even 1-A]
Consider the following
In order to get High 1-A, the character must exceed the framework of the lower levels entirely, and not simply be at the top of an existing lower hierarchy or simply transcend a Hierarchy of Infinite Reality>Fiction Transcendences 1-A+). For instance, if in a verse there is a Hierarchy of Infinite (or even a non-Infinite number) Levels of Qualitative Superiorities (A Reality-Fiction hierarchy, for instance), with each level seeing the one below as completely Fictional, then simply existing at the top, of say, the "Infinity-th" level on that Hierarchy will not qualify for this tier, as such as character is still within the Logical Framework defining that Hierarchy. In the same vein, simply qualitatively transcending this Hierarchy, while working on a higher Hierarchy of Qualitative Superiorities that still works on the same notion/level of Reality/Fiction transcendences as the first hierarchy, would not qualify for this either. This is essentially because, while the character indeed functions on a higher Hierarchy, they still possess the same common Genus/Quality that exists in all Reality-Fiction levels of a higher Hierarchy, as them being on a higher hierarchy simply means their Non-Common Genus is of a higher level. For example, an amount of Aleph-1 or higher layers of Reality-Fiction transcendences technically means that the Aleph-1-th Layer is something above the Infinite Hierarchy from 0 to Aleph-Null, however, that does not change the fact that if we simply add another level on top of the Aleph-Null Hierarchy, we will indeed reach Aleph-1 in terms of standing, and the same goes for all Possible amounts of 1-A Layers .Therefore, a High 1-A character must transcend All Possible Levels of 1-A Hierarchies entirely, and not just be a level above the Infinite Layers. This, of course, also includes transcendence over all mathematically possible amount of Reality fiction layers,

One way to achieve this tier is to lack the very distinction between Non 1-A and 1-A (Baseline or Higher). To elaborate, we must know that that each layer of 1-A (even above 1-A+) has the same difference between itself and the lower layer as the difference Baseline 1-A has with Non 1-A. So to say, the Common Genus of All 1-A Hierarchies is also the very Quality distinguishing Non 1-A from 1-A. Thus, if someone lacks and/or transcends the very distinction between Non 1-A and 1-A, they are essentially transcending the very Quality dictating the 1-A Framework, thus achieving a High 1-A rating. A common example in fiction are Monad-like Entities that encompass both Non 1-A and 1-A Layers, or even any two 1-A Layers, and are thus valid examples of High 1-A lack the Quality that defines the 1-A Framework, unless shown otherwise via Anti-Feats

Basically, yeah. A Meta-meta qualitative superiority would be practically be something that transcends all Meta-qualitative extensions above baseline High 1-A, the same way High 1-A transcends 1-A.
Great and clear explanation. Thank you a lot.
 
Back
Top