• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Pro wrestling needs more powers, here are some

Status
Not open for further replies.
The rest or you did not say anything or you showed that you see it well (and in the case of the creation of portals you asked for examples)
I will assume that you do not accept the case of the "Undetaker" motorcycle because it is the same as the tractor but worse
Well after the portals thing I accepted it for Undertaker. My main issue was that only having one statement isn't enough for such a long running franchise, but having multiple statements supports a consistent idea.

For the motorcycle I would actually see that as being valid for optional gear. Because Undertaker uses it multiple times across a couple years.
  • The technological manipulation of "The Fient"
I guess messing with computer screens for Kayfabe makes sense
 
Well after the portals thing I accepted it for Undertaker. My main issue was that only having one statement isn't enough for such a long running franchise, but having multiple statements supports a consistent idea.
Ok
For the motorcycle I would actually see that as being valid for optional gear. Because Undertaker uses it multiple times across a couple years.
Ok
I guess messing with computer screens for Kayfabe makes sense
What is Kayfable?
 
Question, what is the problem with the BFR (considering that Undertaker's BFR is something apart from his portal creation)
 
What is Kayfable?
JdjrJIx.png
 
, what is the problem with the BFR
There's no problem as I already mentioned. My issue was using only one statement and that you should use more. More were provided so that issue was solved.
What is Kayfable?
How does one watch Wrestling and not know what Kayfabe is? Anyways it's the storyline and the in-character performance by the Wrestlers.
 
There's no problem as I already mentioned. My issue was using only one statement and that you should use more. More were provided so that issue was solved.
ok
How does one watch Wrestling and not know what Kayfabe is?
Basically because my contact with WWE is the youtube channel and little else, combined with the fact that I speak Spanish and some words in English escape me
 
Update
Things not accepted for now (until another staff adds more things not accepted):
  • The "Instinctive Action" of everyone except Roman Reigns
  • Brock Lesnar's tractor
  • The manipulation of explosions of "The Undertaker"
 
Last edited:
Update
Things not accepted for now (until another staff adds more things not accepted):
  • The "Instinctive Action" of everyone except Roman Reigns
  • Brock Lesnar's tractor
  • The manipulation of explosions of "The Undertaker"
So everything got accepted except these?
 
basically, but only one Staff, and we need at least 2 to be able to apply the CTR.
Actually, when a revision is straightforward and uncontroversial, only one staff is needed

For reference: See here
Instances of minor revisions may include changes to one or two characters, if it is just the addition of simple abilities that do not fall into the categories of acausality (except type 1), concept manipulation, abstract existence, plot manipulation, information manipulation, causality manipulation, nonexistent physiology, law manipulation etc. or otherwise could be considered particularly controversial or noteworthy.

For minor revisions and self-evident revisions, it is sufficient to seek the approval of one staff member with evaluation rights.

Having said that, pretty much agree with Qaw
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top