Dust_Collector
They/Them- 9,296
- 12,083
Most of them really don't meet the minimum standards, like Charizard is one of the better profiles among normal Pokemon and there's a lotta stuff it's missing to meet our standards. No scans or proper justifications for scaling beyond "well charmander gives off the vibes of being comparable to Ryhorn", No scans or justifications at all for it's range, resistances and weaknesses rely on the reader already knowing the type match ups for Charizard and the damage alterations without linking to anything (At least with the moves it links to the wiki, the resistances just say "yeah it takes half damage from being hit by grass attacks", it's other weaknesses have no scans.
And like I said, Charizard is one of the better profiles. A large chunk of the profiles for example have P&A sections without a single scan to justify anything, not even a link to bulbapedia or something that says what their moveset does.
And like I said, Charizard is one of the better profiles. A large chunk of the profiles for example have P&A sections without a single scan to justify anything, not even a link to bulbapedia or something that says what their moveset does.