• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Pokemon Discussion Thread - Red & Blue arc

Lou_change said:
The verse basically died when the split happened the only reason things are actually happening again is because we undid the split.
Click to expand...
Ahhh theres the problem

You only gaf about how active the verse is in matches than caring about the integrity.

Its so painful this verse is stuck with this. Literally 0 integrity on this verse.
 
Jinx666 said:
Okay and quite frankly whats the point in trying to argue when theres so many pokemon fans here who desperately just want to make Pokemon appear as composite power in general, that they want to mix in anime timelines.
Click to expand...
If you feel like you're right, then argue for it. This site is about accuracy above all, so if you think splitting the canons is more accurate, then try to convince the staff of that. It was done before, so it could possibly be done again.
Jinx666 said:
Okay stop saying irrelevant stuff now.
Click to expand...
What "irrelevant stuff" was I saying?
Jinx666 said:
I dont think i wanna respond to you anymore
Click to expand...
Ok.
 
Lou_change said:
I mean we would finally be allowed to give pokemon TMs and Items.
Click to expand...
💀 💀 💀 💀

I didnt even read this, but yeah, its so obviously people only want to Keep Pokemon in this awful limbo so the pages can make them composites to look stronger
 
ShiftCtrlAltDeleteTabFn said:
If you feel like you're right, then argue for it. This site is about accuracy above all, so if you think splitting the canons is more accurate, then try to convince the staff of that. It was done before, so it could possibly be done again.
Click to expand...


This Verse on this wiki is anything BUT accurate lmao

But im not wasting my time on trying to fix this Verse when we got the great minds in this thread
 
Jinx666 said:
This Verse on this wiki is anything BUT accurate lmao
Click to expand...
Ok, then make CRT's to try to make it more accurate. That's what content revision threads are for.
Jinx666 said:
But im not wasting my time on trying to fix this Verse when we got the great minds in this thread
Click to expand...
Again, none of our votes matter. The only ones who matter are the staff. If you can convince them, great, your thread has passed.
 
Jinx666 said:
Literal impossible task with people who think Pokemon Go is canon lmfaoooo
Click to expand...
Again, it's not us who you have to convince; it's the staff.
Jinx666 said:
Again ive got a life. Quit repeating yourself.
Click to expand...
Cool, so do I.

But if you do want to continue complaining about what is and isn't accepted for Pokemon, remember, you can always try to do something about it.
 
Jinx666 said:
You didnt prove squat? Ive made far more Pokemon profiles than you over time lol

And ones actually relevant to mainline. Meanwhile you can only talk abt lawn mowers
Click to expand...
I have all the profiles I've done listed, and they're >>>>>>> your count.

But anime isn't mainline according to you. You got me though, I did make a profile in one day about a lawnmower that doesn't matter to anything we're talking about.
 
ShiftCtrlAltDeleteTabFn said:
But if you do want to continue complaining about what is and isn't accepted for Pokemon, remember, you can always try to do something about it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and its clearly corrupt.

This shit is irrelevant but its so annoying that this verse is led by people with no integrity when it comes to scaling if we are genuienly treating Pokemon Go animations for FTL
 
Jinx666 said:
You've ltierally been here babyraging for days how your profiles were deleted because you were trying to use unapproved scaling you made no CRT for?
Click to expand...
*Scaling we already used. And they were deleted because you couldn't stop seething about Masters and how better they were than your profiles.
 
You can reasonably scale basically any character wherever you want, what should be avoided are like, EXTREME high-ends and low-ends and circular scaling. Wank, but make it believable wank. Shit should be bulletproof.

I got no horse in the race of canon.
 
Jinx666 said:
They have nothing substantial or profile worthy on this wiki. This is about power scaling, and all you'd be doing is enabling ppl to put their Pokemon playthroughs in a verse thread
Click to expand...
Excuse you? Red who caught Mewtwo & became Champion, beat Team Rocket? Ethan who beat Red? Brendan who caught/beat Rayquaza? Dawn who caught/beat Giratina?
Elio beating Rainbow Rocket?
All of them literally catching them all because there's cutscenes (The Diplomas) for doing specifically that?
Florian beating all the trials, all the gym leaders, Team Star, exploring Area Zero, beating the AI Professor, exploring Kitakami, doing the Ursaluna-Bloodmoon sidequest (Which requires significant Pokedex completion.), beating the Blueberry League, AND stopping the takeover of a whole town by Pecharunt, a mythical?!

I am too tired (From being awake a while yet & having a mild headache.) & exasperated to want to continue this topic with you.
Jinx666 said:
Yeah, it is. Everything about this verse is complicated

If you want to do it right that is
Click to expand...
Not as complicated as you think, & the level you seem to think it is one on which I disagree.
I was speaking in regards to hypothetical protagonist profiles, not the 'verse as a whole.
Jinx666 said:
I deadass didnt respond or read any of this no. I told you i was abridging, im not here to waste more time than i need to.
Click to expand...
Then perhaps you missed the point of what I repeated.
I STILL have a lot of certainty that you & I aren't going to agree or be satisfied on these matters, & this isn't a CRT.
Ergo, us arguing about this doesn't accomplish anything. Thus, I dislike it & wish to cease this debate you.
Jinx666 said:
I'll respond to any repsonse you give. Its on you if you want to continue with that but I deadass am not tryna be silenced by you.[/spoiler]
Click to expand...
I have been telling you I do not expect us having this debate to make any progress or get anything done.

If you don't want to waste time, then arguing with someone who's told you they want to agree to disagree (That means they expect not to align in opinions.), in other words, they & you are at an impasse, then arguing with them in a non-CRT IS a waste of time.

& I find it unpleasant besides, because there's been pages of this debate I've read.

Maybe later I'll be more open to this topic, but my tired, actually headached self currently doesn't expect that, so for the time being, I'd rather you not engage me further on this topic.
You don't have to be silent because of me, I'm just a bluename in a General Discussion Thread. If you wanna type, read & write, do it, this is a forum. That's what the forum is for. But I ask you not try to continue involving me in this topic until I give evidence otherwise. & no, this post is NOT evidence that I wish to continue at this time.
 
Last edited:
Jinx666 said:
Ahhh theres the problem

You only gaf about how active the verse is in matches than caring about the integrity.

Its so painful this verse is stuck with this. Literally 0 integrity on this verse.
Click to expand...
No it wasn't a match thing I mean once that revision past revisions as a whole. The canon split barely effected the verse because none of the supporters wanted to engage with the verse so the split didn't get applied to any of the profiles.
Jinx666 said:
I didnt even read this, but yeah, its so obviously people only want to Keep Pokemon in this awful limbo so the pages can make them composites to look stronger
Click to expand...
I just think it is dumb none of it is even allowed as optional equipment.
 
Jinx666 said:
Yeah, and its clearly corrupt.
Click to expand...
How? The canon was originally split due to a CRT, and it was unsplit two years later with a CRT. That's just business as usual.
Jinx666 said:
This shit is irrelevant but its so annoying that this verse is led by people with no integrity when it comes to scaling if we are genuienly treating Pokemon Go animations for FTL
Click to expand...
This whole hobby is irrelevant to most things, but ok.

And again, if you feel like it's wrong, make a CRT about it. No one can or will stop you.
 
Lou_change said:
No it wasn't a match thing I mean once that revision past revisions as a whole. The canon split barely effected the verse because none of the supporters wanted to engage with the verse so the split didn't get applied to any of the profiles.
Click to expand...
Yeah, cause this verse and site is disorganised, esp when it comes to Pokemon

As if im making it my job to rally you all together lmao. The wiki quite literally is fine with making separate continuity versions of characters, so idk why Pokemon feels the need to cram it all in one (i do actually, its for the sake of overhyping them)
Lou_change said:
I just think it is dumb none of it is even allowed as optional equipment.
Click to expand...
Make separate versions for separate continuities.
 
Imaginym said:
Maybe later I'll be more open to this topic, but my tired, actually headached self currently doesn't expect that, so for the time being, I'd rather you not engage me further on this topic.
Click to expand...
Look at you using bold to try and sound intimidating or smthn 😭

You deadass so NOT have to tell me. I do not care if you specifically are open or not. Just stop responding with paragraphs and then expecting me, who is willing to, not to respond.
 
Aight im calling it there. Thats all the free time im allowing myself on this for now so unfollowing the thread. This verse is just doomed im sry.
 
Jinx666 said:
Look at you using bold to try and sound intimidating or smthn 😭

You deadass so NOT have to tell me. I do not care if you specifically are open or not. Just stop responding with paragraphs and then expecting me, who is willing to, not to respond.
Click to expand...
Ultimately, the point of the bold was for you to read that part, & it seems to have served its purpose.
& my point wasn't to be intimidating. My MO is just verbose, & I was trying to diplomatically request the conversation's cessation. Incredulous that could be perceived as meant to be intimidating, but shrug.

Though in the future, whether I do "paragraphs" or not, I wish you'd show more care for when I express a disinterest in continuing a conversation, as I've done previously here.
Jinx666 said:
Aight im calling it there. Thats all the free time im allowing myself on this for now so unfollowing the thread. This verse is just doomed im sry.
Click to expand...
As I said earlier in this thread, best wishes, & fare well. Just because we disagree doesn't mean I wish ill upon you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DeltaStriker22
Blue String Discussion Thread
Replies
3
Views
229
DeltaStriker22
DeltaStriker22
H3110l12345I20
GTA Discussion Thread
Replies
13
Views
945
Employe
Employe
Lilybitdun
Fraymakers General Discussion Thread
Replies
17
Views
910
Lilybitdun
Lilybitdun
Badlisli
Anger of Stick Discussion Thread
Replies
0
Views
227
Badlisli
Badlisli
Arkenis
Witch Hat Atelier General Discussion Thread
Replies
0
Views
347
Arkenis
Arkenis
Back
Top