- 664
- 328
"By this logic resistance to resistance negation is impossible."
You can resist resistance negation in Wizard101. The only problem is that Shadow magic doesn't care about resistance. It's technically possible to resist certain aspects of Shadow magic, but again that can be negated as well via piercing and Shadow Shrike.
Also, the Rat (one of Spider's much weaker sons) created a golem through Shadow magic which completely negates resistance as well. There's no reason to assume the Rat could accomplish something that Spider couldn't.
Plus the entire argument you're making is potency, and resistance negation is a pretty standard Guardian ability which Oryx completely memes on."
Whether it's a standard ability for the Guardians is irrelevant. Just because they have resistance negation as well that doesn't mean that it's on the same level as Spider's, especially since it's already shown to work against other 2-B beings.
"Additionally, his non-passive Taking is 2-A in potency and he almost definitely opens with this, assuming the passive 2-B Taking isn't enough for whatever reason."
Can he use the non-passive Taking in his 2-B key?
You can resist resistance negation in Wizard101. The only problem is that Shadow magic doesn't care about resistance. It's technically possible to resist certain aspects of Shadow magic, but again that can be negated as well via piercing and Shadow Shrike.
Also, the Rat (one of Spider's much weaker sons) created a golem through Shadow magic which completely negates resistance as well. There's no reason to assume the Rat could accomplish something that Spider couldn't.
Plus the entire argument you're making is potency, and resistance negation is a pretty standard Guardian ability which Oryx completely memes on."
Whether it's a standard ability for the Guardians is irrelevant. Just because they have resistance negation as well that doesn't mean that it's on the same level as Spider's, especially since it's already shown to work against other 2-B beings.
"Additionally, his non-passive Taking is 2-A in potency and he almost definitely opens with this, assuming the passive 2-B Taking isn't enough for whatever reason."
Can he use the non-passive Taking in his 2-B key?