- 4,773
- 1,668
Yes, but it is technically off topic. Also this is near the end of the fight, the calcs being used was before Chapter 168.
Last edited:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One-Punch Man CGT: Settling the Topic of Serious Punch²
- Thread starter Kachon123
- Start date
-
- Tags
- one-punch man
- Status
The_Legendary_Vin
They/Them- 1,239
- 612
Boop bop, following
- 7,409
- 3,790
Ok let's get back on topic, so which calc are we generally leaning towards here?
- 20,606
- 17,606
USK's calc for the most part. So 4-A
- 9,682
- 8,734
Usklaverei's low-end version is the most accurate and polished one.
@USklaverei I'm not sure why you haven't made it yet, but it would be appreciated if you created an actual blog with your calculation.
@USklaverei I'm not sure why you haven't made it yet, but it would be appreciated if you created an actual blog with your calculation.
- 4,773
- 1,668
Post in thread 'The recent 4-A or 3-C One-Punch Man feat'
https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-recent-4-a-or-3-c-one-punch-man-feat.138993/post-4923898
There is also Matt’s input to consider as well.
Hmmm
https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-recent-4-a-or-3-c-one-punch-man-feat.138993/post-4923898
There is also Matt’s input to consider as well.
Hmmm
- 7,409
- 3,790
I still think we should use the Andromeda end as well. Since the view point is from narrator and they've been shown to view galaxies clearly in the distance.
- 4,773
- 1,668
Galaxies that weren’t destroyed though tbf and is definitely intact as well.
That is something we can not ignore as well
That is something we can not ignore as well
- 7,409
- 3,790
That's not what's being argued, it's about the range.
- 11,730
- 11,081
Once again, nobody is arguing that galaxies were destroyed. Omg.
The distance it reaches out has nothing to do with galaxies being destroyed in that area. I am saying it is intergalactic because we see light from other galaxies on various other panels when given views of outer space. Thus, for a space that big to be completely dark like that, there must be no luminous light for at least an intergalactic distance away.
If the attack really did encompass a galaxy, it wouldn't even be 3-C, it'd be decently into 3-B at that point.
- 4,773
- 1,668
Hmmm, fair enough, but technically if the attack did destroy a galaxy, it is technically still within 3-C range.
If it encompass multiple galaxies (which it is technically from Milky Way Galaxy to other galaxies), then it is 3-B.
- 11,730
- 11,081
Nah, cause of how small galaxies are on other panels, if that hole had even one of them in it it'd be a 3-B-sized explosion radius.
- 4,773
- 1,668
Hard to tell though as it technically does involve both solar systems and galaxies.
Also again, solar systems are smaller than a galaxy too tbf.
- 4,773
- 1,668
Ah shoot, that does reminds me as NASA technically coined the term Star Systems in reference to other solar systems that does exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_system
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1230/cosmic-distances.amp
Well, in any case, I am mostly leaning toward the 4A rating currently.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_system
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1230/cosmic-distances.amp
Well, in any case, I am mostly leaning toward the 4A rating currently.
- 939
- 580
My version is missing, in my calculation I assume that it was not an explosion, but a beam that destroyed all the stars it passed through.
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
vsbattles.fandom.com
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
vsbattles.fandom.com
Last edited:
- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #100
AddedMy version is missing, in my calculation I assume that it was not an explosion, but a lightning bolt that destroyed all the stars it passed through.
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
- 2,203
- 1,030
I think this method makes more sense to use than an explosionMy version is missing, in my calculation I assume that it was not an explosion, but a lightning bolt that destroyed all the stars it passed through.
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
- 32,835
- 38,111
Does this calc account for the distance between the stars, i.e. the gap between them?My version is missing, in my calculation I assume that it was not an explosion, but a lightning bolt that destroyed all the stars it passed through.
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
- 3,077
- 1,685
It's pointless. Along with the GBE, the cross section of the star also grows. That is, along with the numerator, the denominator also grows, so the result will be about the same.
- 4,773
- 1,668
It does it seems.
“Distance to the farthest star with the naked eye: 16308 light years | 1.5428559E+20 meters (HD 7389 (V762 Cassiopeiae))”
- 32,835
- 38,111
Yeah, I figured out too late.
- 168,514
- 77,230
So, if Saitama's punches can go back in time and land before he throws them, he clearly seems to have Immeasurable combat speed, on top of the at least 4-A attack potency, as well as battle-oriented Accelerated Development going by the graph displaying his power growth compared with Garou's.
- 2,168
- 2,128
I think it was via matter manipulation, does that still give immeasurable attack speeds?
- 939
- 580
Yes, because the lightning only destroyed the stars it came into contact with, so if empty space were full of stars, it would destroy them too.
- 168,514
- 77,230
In chapter 167 of One-Punch Man, Saitama and Garou clashed fists, which resulted in a shockwave that wiped out a section of space. This Calc Group Thread's purpose is to discuss which of the calcs below is the best logically, mathematically, and contextually.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
PLEASE DO NOT DERAIL.
@Executor_N0 @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Mr._Bambu @Therefir @DMUA @DemonGodMitchAubin @Jasonsith @Wokistan @Armorchompy @Migue79 @Psychomaster35 @CloverDragon03 @Dark-Carioca @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Aguywhodoesthings
What do you think about this?
- 168,514
- 77,230
I will read through the chapter and respond afterwards.
- 4,773
- 1,668
No, it was through time travel
- 2,203
- 1,030
That was done via a time travel ability not sheer speed, it's almost just like the CW Flash's time travel ability where he views the points in time he wants to go to and simply enters them, Saitama from the future punched Garou from the past through that view
- 939
- 580
Something like that was what happened.My version is missing, in my calculation I assume that it was not an explosion, but a beam that destroyed all the stars it passed through.
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
Last edited:
- 4,773
- 1,668
Tbf, it is a energy beam as it is definitely not a lightning bolt.My version is missing, in my calculation I assume that it was not an explosion, but a lightning bolt that destroyed all the stars it passed through.
If it was an explosion at least 16,000 light years away it doesn't make sense that it destroyed stars that are closer than that, so there must not have been a completely black void left.
One-Punch Man - Serious Punch^2
- 939
- 580
oops translation error
- 168,514
- 77,230
Saitama's punch seems to have gone back in time at the very least, but I am not sure if it was done via a time travel ability or immeasurable speed. Maybe we can list it as "Possibly Immeasurable" speed?
- 4,773
- 1,668
It is as it was stated “went back in time”.
https://**********/read/imgur/mUagtWL/1/63/
- 939
- 580
I think that should be another key ?
- 168,514
- 77,230
Yes, I am also inclined to list him with the following statistics after the last chapters:
"At least Multi-Solar System level" attack potency; "Likely Immeasurable" speed, "Accelerated Development"; and possibly Limited Power Mimicry and Portal Creation as well.
- Status
Similar threads
