- 34,591
- 35,024
Well, no. That's not a great solution. We're not going to intentionally restrict ourselves to statistics and calculations that may be wrong if we can do something about them.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Piece: Problem with earthquake calcs
- Thread starter Floxy178
- Start date
- 34
- 60
[Every Single Year Its the same Repetitive arguments] No offense to you but your solution is garbage, Also 15 Prime Calcs for the verse has been removed and almost all of pre ts is butchered, So your solution is to remove every calc and leave the verse Up to speculation and scaling to lets see early Post Ts Hody Jones and Dressrosa?? If you are downgrading a verse and removing over 15+ calculation A SOLUTION Should always be given to a problem, You cannot simply VOID an Entire Scaling Base for a verse then just leave it up to the lowest possible scale which then makes Every character Including those post ts scale to 1 Value Which then makes everyones profiles Look like this Higher Far Higher Even higher ??????
IF Nothing can be calculated for the verse You might as well Put Everybody Unknown Until the series end dont you think? [ I think my rambling will crowd this thread so i will leave it at that]
- 34,591
- 35,024
Well, now you're just derailing. I shouldn't have to point out that this has nothing to do with the earthquake calcs.
- 177,714
- 90,779
Well, to be fair, you do seem to be obsessed with downgrading One Piece. Beyond a certain point of repetition year in and year out it is hard to not notice a continuous pattern.
But we should stick to the main topic, yes. Although we do need proper accepted replacement calculations for all of the major feats that have been rejected.
But we should stick to the main topic, yes. Although we do need proper accepted replacement calculations for all of the major feats that have been rejected.
- 5,140
- 4,225
Ant... This is a highly inappropriate comment... Damage does the same thing for most other verses like Naruto and DB, something we are happy for since he is one of the few staff that actually bothers keeping them in check, outside of it's supporters. (Since a Large majority of staff dislikes dealing with HST at all)
We have answered this comment twice in this thread already, these specific calc's won't get replacement's due to it being almost impossible to get the information required to calc it properly, and the actual replacement "tier/scaling" will be done in a follow up thread after this.But we should stick to the main topic, yes. Although we do need proper accepted replacement calculations for all of the major feats that have been rejected.
- 177,714
- 90,779
Well, I did not mean any disrespect or offence, but as I said, beyond a certain extreme point it is hard to not notice a pattern. But maybe I am mistaken.
Hmm. I think that the most impressive feat should receive as good approximation calculations as possible.
- 5,140
- 4,225
Well, yeah, @Damage3245 seemingly focuses mainly on debunking stuff. That's not an issue (Hell, I would argue that it is quite a good thing); the issue is that you phrased it like it was targeted against One Piece, and thereby does it based on an agenda, not accuracy.
I can tell you that that won't be happen in this thread since it would be completely unrelated to why these calcs are being removed. (Can't answer the rest though, since I am neither a calc member nor a supporter of the verse)Hmm. I think that the most impressive feat should receive as good approximation calculations as possible.
- 177,714
- 90,779
I have no idea what Damage's motivation is, but it is likely based on his own perceptions of accuracy, yes.
There does seem to be a systematic invalidation of calculations for the greatest feats of this verse though, and it is easily one of the most important (popular and socially relevant) verses in this wiki, so we should prioritise getting them properly acceptably calculated.
There does seem to be a systematic invalidation of calculations for the greatest feats of this verse though, and it is easily one of the most important (popular and socially relevant) verses in this wiki, so we should prioritise getting them properly acceptably calculated.
- 34,591
- 35,024
Attacking motivation is irrelevant as it becomes an Appeal to Motive fallacy; tackle the argument, not the person making the argument.
Not to mention this thread wasn't even started by me.
Not to mention this thread wasn't even started by me.
- 177,714
- 90,779
Well, regardless, it is extremely important that we get the greatest feats for this verse acceptably recalculated.
@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Chariot190
You are some of our most skilled mathematicians here. Would any of you be willing to handle it please?
@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Chariot190
You are some of our most skilled mathematicians here. Would any of you be willing to handle it please?
- 177,714
- 90,779
- 34,591
- 35,024
We need to get it accepted first that the calculations are to be removed. As I said earlier; one thing at a time.
Sorry. Using the word "attacking" loosely here. It goes out generally to everyone rather than you specifically Ant.
I wouldn't call what I said above an attack...
Sorry. Using the word "attacking" loosely here. It goes out generally to everyone rather than you specifically Ant.
- 4,239
- 4,085
Wasn’t tagged but I can probably help out, or Floxy (I believe he’s also one of our more skilled calculators).Well, regardless, it is extremely important that we get the greatest feats for this verse acceptably recalculated.
@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Chariot190
You are some of our most skilled mathematicians here. Would any of you be willing to handle it please?
What’s the reason as to why we can’t calculate these feats, I know they’re bunk but I can’t be bothered to read them rn so an explanation would be great.
- 177,714
- 90,779
No problem.
- 918
- 271
you can try to call Agnaa
Maybe can help with this thread
- 35,097
- 41,722
@DontTalkDT What do you think should be done here?
- 1,039
- 1,104
- Thread starter
- #137
What do you think about OP? Maybe we should tackle 2 calcs in the OP first before discussing WB one.
- 177,714
- 90,779
- 1,039
- 1,104
- Thread starter
- #140
Didn't DT already give his stance?
I think we should focus on 2 calcs that already have 2 votes as their issues are common. As I said WB one can be discussed later because Its potential issue is different from 2 calcs in the OP.
- 34,591
- 35,024
Yeah. We just need one more calc group member to comment on the two in the OP.
- 5,140
- 4,225
Bump.
- 5,140
- 4,225
We would prefer more votes; DT has already voted for the removal.What do we currently need to do here? Should I ask for help from DontTalk again?
- 1,039
- 1,104
- Thread starter
- #148
Currently we need at least 1 more vote aside from Damage and DT.What do we currently need to do here? Should I ask for help from DontTalk again?
- 34,591
- 35,024
KLOL has commented on the thread, but I don't think he's given a vote on the calcs in the OP as far as I'm aware.
- 177,714
- 90,779
Can somebody quote his post here please?
- 1,039
- 1,104
- Thread starter
- #151
Here
- 1,039
- 1,104
- Thread starter
- #153
You can tag him again if you want. I asked if I should put him as agree in the OP to be 100% sure but he hasn't responded yet.Thank you, although that seems rather offhanded/noncommital.
- 177,714
- 90,779
Can somebody quote his post here please?
Thank you, although that seems rather offhanded/noncommital.
@DontTalkDT
Qurbonboev
He/Him- 2,780
- 1,681
May I ask for how this values vere produced? No blogs were linked to it
- 1,039
- 1,104
- Thread starter
- #157
I'm sure I just directly used found magnitude without applying magnitude at distance fomrula.
- 177,714
- 90,779
Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,506
- 1,483
It's not a direct vote but Bambu somewhat put his opinion on this matter:
vsbattles.com
Problem with earthquake calculations
Hello everyone thank you for taking the time to read this. I"ll try to keep it as brief as possible, as to not take up too much of your time. If you would like me to elaborate further please let me know. I"ll quickly explain the method we currently use to calculate characters shaking a...
Similar threads
- Locked
