- 8,438
- 3,293
Brace yourselves for some math, but this needs to be done.
Looks like something is going on with Mogo the Living Planet's feat. Found here, this calc shows what would be needed to light the universe. Mogo's part of the list of feats is only a measly 98 MegaFOE; not even in 4-A. However, when Darkanine calculated a feat for Necrozma, he found that lighting a distance equal to ~14000 light years yielded 31.8 FOE. This result is 3,081,761.0063 times less than Mogo's 98 MegaFOE, but this still doesn't make sense.
At first this could seem plausible. A radius of 46.4 billion light years is 3,286,747.71806 larger than the radius of 13,954 LY, which isn't far off the mark of 3.08 million times difference, with only about a 6.65% difference between the two values. But this isn't about radius. It is about area.
The problem is really compounded when we look at it in terms of area. The area of a sphere with the radius of 1.32015x10^20 meters (13954 light years) is 2.19×10^41 cubic meters. The area of a sphere with the radius of 4.339x10^26 meters is 2.37×10^54 cubic meters. At first glance this doesn't look too bad, but the difference between 2.19x10^41 and 2.37x10^54 is 1.082x10^13. Aside from being a big number, what does that mean? It means the area for a universe-radius sphere is more than 10 TRILLION times more than that of a ~14000 light year radius sphere. So why is lighting the universe only 3.08 million times more, when the difference between 1.082x10^13 and 3.081X10^6 is 3,511,846.803?
Why Mogo's Calc is less powerful: The Calculation for Mogo assumed that he was only as bright as Sirius is to us, instead of using the Sun. This would assume that the "beacon that lights the the universe" only appeared like a star to those on the edge of the universe. So is this valid? It depends on context. While I think Mogo could only be interpreted as a bright star, like Sirius, we need to stop saying "lighting the universe is 4-B," because it isn't. Lighting the universe like Sirius would light the Earth (not much) is 4-B. Lighting the universe like the Sun would light the Earth is 294.386 TeraFOE, cleanly into 4-A.
TLDR: Lighting the universe depends on context. We need to stop instantly saying "lighting the universe is 4-B," because it isn't automatically. Lighting the universe can be as low as 98 MegaFOE, up to 294.386 TeraFOE, or even higher if the light that illuminates the universe is more bright than the Sun appears to us.
Context matters.
This isn't hard-and-fast.
Looks like something is going on with Mogo the Living Planet's feat. Found here, this calc shows what would be needed to light the universe. Mogo's part of the list of feats is only a measly 98 MegaFOE; not even in 4-A. However, when Darkanine calculated a feat for Necrozma, he found that lighting a distance equal to ~14000 light years yielded 31.8 FOE. This result is 3,081,761.0063 times less than Mogo's 98 MegaFOE, but this still doesn't make sense.
At first this could seem plausible. A radius of 46.4 billion light years is 3,286,747.71806 larger than the radius of 13,954 LY, which isn't far off the mark of 3.08 million times difference, with only about a 6.65% difference between the two values. But this isn't about radius. It is about area.
The problem is really compounded when we look at it in terms of area. The area of a sphere with the radius of 1.32015x10^20 meters (13954 light years) is 2.19×10^41 cubic meters. The area of a sphere with the radius of 4.339x10^26 meters is 2.37×10^54 cubic meters. At first glance this doesn't look too bad, but the difference between 2.19x10^41 and 2.37x10^54 is 1.082x10^13. Aside from being a big number, what does that mean? It means the area for a universe-radius sphere is more than 10 TRILLION times more than that of a ~14000 light year radius sphere. So why is lighting the universe only 3.08 million times more, when the difference between 1.082x10^13 and 3.081X10^6 is 3,511,846.803?
Why Mogo's Calc is less powerful: The Calculation for Mogo assumed that he was only as bright as Sirius is to us, instead of using the Sun. This would assume that the "beacon that lights the the universe" only appeared like a star to those on the edge of the universe. So is this valid? It depends on context. While I think Mogo could only be interpreted as a bright star, like Sirius, we need to stop saying "lighting the universe is 4-B," because it isn't. Lighting the universe like Sirius would light the Earth (not much) is 4-B. Lighting the universe like the Sun would light the Earth is 294.386 TeraFOE, cleanly into 4-A.
TLDR: Lighting the universe depends on context. We need to stop instantly saying "lighting the universe is 4-B," because it isn't automatically. Lighting the universe can be as low as 98 MegaFOE, up to 294.386 TeraFOE, or even higher if the light that illuminates the universe is more bright than the Sun appears to us.
Context matters.
This isn't hard-and-fast.