OC COSMOLOGY

[DeathxMoonZ]

Ok so i’ve been wondering, if my cosmology has uncountably infinite multiverses and those multiverses transcend each other and they also each have Uncountably Infinite Higher Dimensions, where would this typical scale? Also beyond the multiverses are outerverse structures (beyond spacetime and dimensionality).

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Multiverse stuff would be Low 1-A, and the stuff beyond it flat 1-A.

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

Multiverse stuff would be Low 1-A, and the stuff beyond it flat 1-A.

Now could a omniverse contain my multiverses while the outerverses are beyond the omniverse?

Multiverse stuff would be Low 1-A, and the stuff beyond it flat 1-A.

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

Now could a omniverse contain my multiverses while the outerverses are beyond the omniverse?

Now could a omniverse contain my multiverses while the outerverses are beyond the omniverse?

Also while the omniverse is containing the multiverses, it’d still be low 1-A?

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Also while the omniverse is containing the multiverses, it’d still be low 1-A?

Yes.

 

[Napoleondevious]

Multiverse stuff would be Low 1-A, and the stuff beyond it flat 1-A.

how ? it just seems high into High hyperversal+

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

how ? it just seems high into High hyperversal+

It depends on what he means by transcending each other, really.

 

[Napoleondevious]

It depends on what he means by transcending each other, really.

transcending dont mean anything like this, at most its a sort of idmensional transcandence

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

It depends on what he means by transcending each other, really.

Like each multiverse is superior than the one below it and it goes on and on

 

[Napoleondevious]

Like each multiverse is superior than the one below it and it goes on and on

yes obviously, but what difference ? like their relation

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

yes obviously, but what difference ? like their relation

the higher-level multiverse is qualitatively beyond the scope of the lower-level one, existing on a fundamentally different plane of existence. Like layers of existence. Does that make sense?

 

[Napoleondevious]

the higher-level multiverse is qualitatively beyond the scope of the lower-level one, existing on a fundamentally different plane of existence. Like layers of existence. Does that make sense?

ig, if thats true the set of the multiverses is 1-A+ (uncountable layers) and the outer structure is very likely high outer

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

ig, if thats true the set of the multiverses is 1-A+ (uncountable layers) and the outer structure is very likely high outer

Now could i have something contain the multiverses like a omniverse? And would it still be 1-A+ while the outer structures are obviously beyond all of this?

 

[Napoleondevious]

Now could i have something contain the multiverses like a omniverse? And would it still be 1-A+ while the outer structures are obviously beyond all of this?

yes, like a greater layer or just a larger structure than the last layer

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

yes, like a greater layer or just a larger structure than the last layer

Alright and for final confirmation you are 1000% sure the multiverses are 1-A+ like no second thoughts?

 

[Napoleondevious]

Alright and for final confirmation you are 1000% sure the multiverses are 1-A+ like no second thoughts?

is there are inf multiverse, and each qualitatively transcands the last like you described, yes 100%

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

is there are inf multiverse, and each qualitatively transcands the last like you described, yes 100%

Alright also, since my omniverse contains my multiverses, would my metaphysical realms be beyond the omniverse like the outer structures or would the metaphysical realms be contained within the omniverse as well?

 

[Frey_Starlight]

the higher-level multiverse is qualitatively beyond the scope of the lower-level one, existing on a fundamentally different plane of existence. Like layers of existence. Does that make sense?

Alright and for final confirmation you are 1000% sure the multiverses are 1-A+ like no second thoughts?

for current vsbw standards it is 1-A+

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

for current vsbw standards it is 1-A+

Thank you, and so my metaphysical realms and outer structures would be High 1-A since they qualitatively transcend my omniverse?

 

[Lukewoesal007]

Ok so i’ve been wondering, if my cosmology has uncountably infinite multiverses and those multiverses transcend each other and they also each have Uncountably Infinite Higher Dimensions, where would this typical scale? Also beyond the multiverses are outerverse structures (beyond spacetime and dimensionality).

If your cosmology had all that I would be immediately disinclined to read any of your work.

 

[Ebihara]

Does all of this need to exist story wise? Just cause a cosmology is strong complex and powerful doesn't make it intresting.

 

[Napoleondevious]

strong cosmo = good writting

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

Does all of this need to exist story wise? Just cause a cosmology is strong complex and powerful doesn't make it intresting.

I just like having a massive cosmology but the stories will be good its not just about the cosmology and the powerful things in it

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

If your cosmology had all that I would be immediately disinclined to read any of your work.

Why? I mean yea its big but its not just about power it will have really good stories kinda similar to Hp lovecraft and Dark tower

 

[SweetDao]

Being big is pointless. Heck, even having a single finite universe is more often than not, always underutilized by authors (either by choice or by consequences).

The simpler, the better. This is the same with abilities and such.

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

Being big is pointless. Heck, even having a single finite universe is more often than not, always underutilized by authors (either by choice or by consequences).

The simpler, the better. This is the same with abilities and such.

Ehh yea understandable but i just like big cosmologies their more interesting to me

 

[Ebihara]

thats fair to each there own. I agree with dao though, usually a finite univerese is enough to properly tell a story. But i am a wall level lover.

 

[SweetDao]

Ehh yea understandable but i just like big cosmologies their more interesting to me

"More interesting" = big numbers over big numbers. You'll understand one day why it's pointless tbf.

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

"More interesting" = big numbers over big numbers. You'll understand one day why it's pointless tbf.

I mean people have their own opinions about what they like, if YOU don’t like it then thats understandable

 

[Napoleondevious]

Being big is pointless. Heck, even having a single finite universe is more often than not, always underutilized by authors (either by choice or by consequences).

The simpler, the better. This is the same with abilities and such.

BOIIIIII big cosmo are tuff, anything below 1-A is bad

 

[Ebihara]

I think there are truly very few stories that make FULL GOOD use of being even low 2-c or above.

 

[SweetDao]

BOIIIIII big cosmo are tuff, anything below 1-A is bad

Mange

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

Mange

Mange

So let me ask you something, my cosmology isn’t finalized yet but ok lets say i have just a multiverse that’s uncountably infinite, with uncountably infinite higher dimensions, that multiverse would scale to what?

 

[Napoleondevious]

So let me ask you something, my cosmology isn’t finalized yet but ok lets say i have just a multiverse that’s uncountably infinite, with uncountably infinite higher dimensions, that multiverse would scale to what?

we already answered you diddybluden
also you did not give all infos to sweet dao

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

we already answered you diddybluden
also you did not give all infos to sweet dao

I know but its not finalized meaning i can still change it

 

[Napoleondevious]

I know but its not finalized meaning i can still change it

you would change the cosmology of your verse under sweet dao's response ?

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

you would change the cosmology of your verse under sweet dao's response ?

No im just asking questions bro i’m not ready to finalize it yet. Could you give me a example of a High 1-A+ cosmology?

 

[Ebihara]

insert flowerly lanunge here

Tier High 1-A

vsbattles.fandom.com

not sure if we have a caterogy for high 1-a+ but find a verse thats high 1-a+ and then look at its cosmolgy blog.

 

[Napoleondevious]

No im just asking questions bro i’m not ready to finalize it yet. Could you give me a example of a High 1-A+ cosmology?

a high 1A+ cosmo could be like the dream of a tier 0 or modal realism

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

a high 1A+ cosmo could be like the dream of a tier 0 or modal realism

So my tier 0 would have to be the source and ground of everything basically like its the stage and its creations are the writers and audiences basically?