• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

NonDuality tier question

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't really think nonduality is nessesary for 1-A only.

For example Galactus was stated to be the opposite to what the Inbetweener is. It been stated many time for galactus that he is neither the absence of dualities. that he is neither time and space.( I will get that scan later)

Here is also an example of the Living tribunal that the living tribunal heads are vengeance, necessity and equity. In the realm of vengeance is death and chaos etc, in the realm of nessesary is the realm of life, time, space and order and in the realm of equity there is the realm of dualities which is all 3 reallms and there could be even more then that. (another statement that inbetweener embodies all dualities ) here is LT saying Galactus has no opposites other then the inbetweener .

That the inbetweener was born as both like he is time and space, good and evil, god and man and more while galactus was stated to be neither he would be none between the both of what the inbetweener is. (Like it is a human mind we can choose for both (Inbetweener) and neither of both(galactus)
 
The current version of the page doesn't say that nonduality is for 1-A only.

That error was fixed recently (well, a month ago).

Soooo.... you are right? (no idea whether the examples you give make sense, though)
 
DontTalkDT said:
The current version of the page doesn't say that nonduality is for 1-A only.
That error was fixed recently (well, a month ago).

Soooo.... you are right? (no idea whether the examples you give make sense, though)
Also it was evidence that LT and Galactus has transduality
 
No problem. Should I close this thread then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top