• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Nonduality stuff

Megaraptor149

He/Him
Messages
2,301
Reaction score
798
Does being completely independent from human logic grant Nonduality by default? If yes, what type?"
 
Umm...as far as I am aware no. (Unless the human logic in this example verse is an actual metaphysical/conceptual system that has actual effects and consequences on reality) simply put, there are many over exaggerative terms that say things like "being beyond human knowledge", "beyond the scope of humanity", etc. These by themselves don't serve as adequate proof for ND, to quote the page

"Nonduality and Transduality are states of being wherein an entity exists independently of, or qualitatively beyond, various dual systems, ranging from specific, limited sets of dual distinctions to duality itself on a conceptual level"

Now, giving you the benefit of the doubt assuming human logic in this example verse serves as an actual dual system that is actually apart of/affects reality or is some sort of actual universal concept. Then, the type it grants could honestly be any of them tbh. Type 1 would assume human logic would be one side of the same coin with...well let's say "lacking human knowledge" that way in this example 1 (being human knowledge) and 0 (being the lack of human knowledge) would grant type 1.

However, assuming human logic in this example verse occupies an entire level of reality then it would be type 2. Finally, it could be type 3 using the many valued truths logics since theoretically by being independent of human logic they'd be beyond contradiction-allowing logic. But I should warn you, this is a MASSIVE stretch and 9.9/10 times you won't get this accepted without more adequate proof, as like I said earlier simply being independent of human logic without further support is meaningless. Hope that was able to give you a solid answer!
 
Back
Top