NikHelton's Baki Cloud Calc Discussion

[LegendariumOfLies]

This what derailed the previous thread.

Calculation Here:

Retsu defeats Hades

vsbattles.fandom.com

Discuss.

 

[NikHelton]

In essence, this feat is very similar to the similar feat of Gouketsu from OPM.

One-Punch Man: Gouketsu Cloud Feat

vsbattles.fandom.com

I admit the abnormality of the cloud height and I even directly pointed it out in the comments under the blog.
Even if we use a value of 600 meters instead of 1300 for the cloud thickness, the situation will hardly improve. This will be a height of 40 km instead of 90.

However, I attributed this to a problem of the logical component, given that in Gouketsu's feat, the clouds should be at an altitude of 13 km and the buildings under the clouds should be abnormally high.

I am not going to defend this calculation, because I immediately noted the problems with the scaling of the height.
Perhaps the method itself is incorrect and we should also reconsider Gouketsu's feat.
Or perhaps this can be attributed to a logical error of the artist.
My position is neutral, because clouds 13 meters thick also do not make much sense.

 

[LegendariumOfLies]

Yeah, 98 km is pretty insane. I think you should assume the height of the lowest cloud is the average height of a cumulus and then use it to pixel scale the others.

 

[Viott]

Regarding the earthquake calculation above, I disagree with mag 7,8 and 9 because the house made of wood did not collapse.

 

[NikHelton]

Regarding the earthquake calculation above, I disagree with magma 7,8 and 9 because the house made of wood did not collapse.

Yes, you're right. I was starting from the destruction at the epicenter, forgetting that there was no such destruction in the distance. I suggest just using magnitudes 7, 8 and 9 at the epicenter. That was reasonable, so thanks for the comment.

 

[NikHelton]

I'm actually having a bit of a hard time deciding on the type of clouds. Based on the clouds in the background, they look like cirrus.

However, the clouds that dispersed look like a nimbostat if you look closely.

 

[LegendariumOfLies]

Any chance we can get a CGM in here to help?

 

[Viott]

I'm actually having a bit of a hard time deciding on the type of clouds. Based on the clouds in the background, they look like cirrus.

However, the clouds that dispersed look like a nimbostat if you look closely.

I think it's a Cumulus cloud because they have flat bases.

 

[LegendariumOfLies]

Bump

 

[LegendariumOfLies]

BUMP

 

[LegendariumOfLies]

Bump

 

[Viott]

The power of Hades

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[NikHelton]

Retsu defeats Hades

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[NikHelton]

Fixed

 

[Viott]

Retsu defeats Hades

vsbattles.fandom.com

My calculation is accepted.

 

[NikHelton]

My calculation is accepted.

The earthquake was called the strongest in hundreds of years, and the building at the epicenter began to collapse. It is definitely above magnitude 4 and 5.

You also used a 1 second timeframe for KE, but you did not take into account that the clouds began to disperse at the moment when the miasma passed through them.
Otherwise, it turns out that the clouds began to move before contact with the miasma, which is incorrect.

The fact that your calculation was accepted does not mean that I cannot make my own version.

 

[Viott]

The earthquake was called the strongest in hundreds of years, and the building at the epicenter began to collapse. It is definitely above magnitude 4 and 5.

You also used a 1 second timeframe for KE, but you did not take into account that the clouds began to disperse at the moment when the miasma passed through them.
Otherwise, it turns out that the clouds began to move before contact with the miasma, which is incorrect.

The fact that your calculation was accepted does not mean that I cannot make my own version.

You are ignoring the fact that the earthquake did not destroy the wooden house. If the distance is less than 60 km, you need to use the formula '(Magnitude at distance) + 0.0238*r' to find the Richter magnitude. I assumed that the clouds disperse in 1 second. The timeframe you calculated is nonsense. If you want to recalculate using my accepted calculation, first the calculation must be accepted, and then a CGD needs to be opened.

 

[NikHelton]

You are ignoring the fact that the earthquake did not destroy the wooden house. If the distance is less than 60 km, you need to use the formula '(Magnitude at distance) + 0.0238*r' to find the Richter magnitude. I assumed that the clouds disperse in 1 second. The timeframe you calculated is nonsense. If you want to recalculate using my accepted calculation, first the calculation must be accepted, and then a CGD needs to be opened.

Yes, the lack of destruction at long range is why I decided against using the radius to the epicenter.

Thanks for reminding me. I'll change the formula for a smaller radius once I get home.

No, don't call my timeframes nonsense if you're not an expert on the subject. If you assume that the miasma reached the edge in a second, you should understand that the clouds dissipated at the end of that timeframe.

I don't mind making a thread with a discussion. However, you forget that you yourself need to make a thread about reviewing the content before adding the calculation to the verse page

 

[Viott]

Yes, the lack of destruction at long range is why I decided against using the radius to the epicenter.

Thanks for reminding me. I'll change the formula for a smaller radius once I get home.

No, don't call my timeframes nonsense if you're not an expert on the subject. If you assume that the miasma reached the edge in a second, you should understand that the clouds dissipated at the end of that timeframe.

I don't mind making a thread with a discussion. However, you forget that you yourself need to make a thread about reviewing the content before adding the calculation to the verse page

You divide the thickness of the cloud by the speed of the Miasma, assuming that the cloud moves 2965.5 meters within this time frame. However, the issue is that there is no evidence that the Miasma spreads 2965.5 meters without surpassing the thickness of the cloud, and this is a very large High Ball.

Since this is a Supporting Calc, I don't think it's necessary to open the Crt.