HakutoRei000
He/Him- 1,174
- 267
So a principle is stated as being the primordial state of existence in which with other principle predate the physical reality.
Then the world came to be as boundaryless, chaotic, primordial darkness.
Then become void of nothingness as the stillness in which reality is carved upon.
From these two principle concepts were derived, dimension (spatial and temporal) is derived, and law is established, thus become the physical and material world.
Given that nothingness itself is presented as a later-derived state originating from this primordial condition, would it be reasonable to infer that the principle is not merely nonexistent, but exists prior to the distinction between existence and nonexistence altogether, potentially qualifying for Nonexistent Physiology Type 2 (Idealistic Nonexistence)?
Then the world came to be as boundaryless, chaotic, primordial darkness.
Then become void of nothingness as the stillness in which reality is carved upon.
From these two principle concepts were derived, dimension (spatial and temporal) is derived, and law is established, thus become the physical and material world.
Given that nothingness itself is presented as a later-derived state originating from this primordial condition, would it be reasonable to infer that the principle is not merely nonexistent, but exists prior to the distinction between existence and nonexistence altogether, potentially qualifying for Nonexistent Physiology Type 2 (Idealistic Nonexistence)?
