• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Naruto vs Saitama

Status
Not open for further replies.
He said it was potency not DC.

And Nasruto dosen't have continental potency, since he didn't hurt someone with contiental durability
 
Sorry to butt in, especially as I like Coolkid 11, and owe him one for sticking up for me previously, but if Toneri can cut a moon in half, and Naruto is as strong as Toneri, then it seems to me that Naruto should be moon level. Terrax was gauged as planet level+ on the same merit (cutting one in half). I hope that you don't take offense Coolkid? That said, Saitama is likely even stronger than that, but since he is a slacker, we haven't actually seen any demonstrations of his limits.
 
Hey your an admin and you seem pretty smart so what do you think about the mountain being only the size of two trees?
 
Sorry to butt in, especially as I like Coolkid 11, and owe him one for sticking up for me previously, but if Toneri can cut a moon in half, and Naruto is as strong as Toneri, then it seems to me that Naruto should be moon level.

Sorry, but film isn't canon.

Or you can show me Kishimoto's statement.

You can post original japanese text, if you want
 
Hey your an admin and you seem pretty smart so what do you think about the mountain being only the size of two trees?

No, it's impossible.

I'm just proved, that "mountain" in Naruto are crags in fact.

So we should call it crags now
 
I have no opinion about the trees, but the way I remember seeing it reported on Anime News Network, the film was supposed to be the official story about how Naruto and Hinata got together between the second to last and final chapters of the manga.
 
Heres more proof its canon http://www.saiyanisland.com/2014/10/the-last-naruto-movie-about-love-more-story-information/. And look at the trivia at this http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/The_Last:_Naruto_the_Movie "

  • The movie is the first film to be an official part of the canon Naruto storyline, set during the timeskip that occurs between chapters 699 and 700. In an advertisement published along with the final two chapters, the film was officially dubbed chapter "699.5."
  • This film is said to be a love story by Masashi Kishimoto, given how he always wanted to write one. As such, its tagline is "The last episode; a first love" (µ£ÇÕ¥îÒü«þë®Þ¬×Òü»ÒÇüÒü»ÒüÿÒéüÒüªÒü«µäø, Saigo no episōdo wa, hajimete no ai).
 
Press releases are fully acceptable. Based on the style of writing, is that you trying to stir up conflict again, N Agizar?
 
So this means, that only parts of film are canon it's story about HinatexNaruto.

And since Toneri isn't exist in manga he is filler character
 
Well, we cannot say much for certain until we have seen the full movie in much better quality, so we won't place Naruto at moon level at the moment, but if the official press releases say that the story is canon and supervised by the Naruto creator, you cannot cherry pick that only part of it is canon.
 
Antvasima this guy will do anything to downplay naruto even if you show an interview. This movie is canon and Toneri is a canon character
 
Agreed. I think that it is N Agizar. An extremely persistent troll on this and the Anime Characters Fight wiki.
 
I agree with SwordSlayer99 and Antvasima with naruto possibly being Moon Level as well as Toneri. Everyone else is just downplaying. Like if you think the trees=mountains in size...welll.....you're just stupid...XD. Also the movie is canon so like I said before...Deal with it.
 
Naruto is strong enough to kill Saitama but he is too slow to do so. In terms of strength Naruto >> Saitama. In terms of speed Saitama >>>>> Naruto. If speed was equal Naruto would win but without it he gets stomped.
 
178.186.61.41 said:
Also look
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=K_mLJ-vRhFc&app=desktop

Sword was size of Toneri (1:37)

1:52 - 1:55 look at this

1, 90 m sized hole in moon was compared to moon.

This means, that Moon in Naruto is very small
Click to expand...
I have seen this kind of logic so many times, and it's really really ridiculous. You should try to draw and publish a comic book, then you will know that's really hard to draw everything with correct ratios and proportions. It's must take tons of time and authors usually do not have that much, so they may pick some random ratios. Finally, your proof is nothing except Kishimoto agrees with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Sdjlakjh
Saitama vs Josuke Higashikata (Jojolion) (0-0-0)
Replies
18
Views
2K
Sdjlakjh
Sdjlakjh
Artorimachi_Meteoraft
Piposh vs saitama
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fallen_Angelicx
Fallen_Angelicx
Artorimachi_Meteoraft
The hunter vs saitama (grace)
Replies
11
Views
2K
ReaperAndBlues
ReaperAndBlues
XSOULOFCINDERX
Saitama vs Garou: High 6-A Edition [0-0-0]
Replies
2
Views
1K
Bernkastelll
Bernkastelll
Dragongod224
Mori Jin vs Naruto Uzumaki (New Era)| (Mori vote= 7| Naruto vote= 0
2
Replies
75
Views
3K
Dragongod224
Dragongod224
Back
Top