My problem with 2-C to 2-B

[Zamasu_Chan]

To keep this short and sweet, my problem comes from the fact that 2-C and 2-B are basically the same, to be blunt about it. There's no concrete difference between the two because they're both "destroying finite amounts of space time continuums" however it's just different finite numbers. For instance there's absolutely zero difference between the bridge between 2-C and 2-B. 2-C ends at 1,000 universes while 2-B starts at 1,001. That's like having a completely different tier for characters who are 1000x baseline 3-A. Why have these numbers suddenly separate the tiers? In my opinion it comes off as arbitrary, unnecessary and over complicated.

To me it should 2-C should be universal + and 2-B is 2 to any finite amount of universes. However this is my opinion and I made this a discussion thread because I don't wanna pull a stunt that could potentially change the tiering system without discussing it. Plus I wanted to see the various opinions on this, especially staff.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

>General discussion board

Really

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

I gave my reasons for it so why not?

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

@Blue, since you're the only one that contributed, what are your thoughts.

 

[My_area]

I believe 2-C and 2-B is there for convience and making 2-C and 2-B into one would be too much of a big tier and it would be harder to distinguish between someone who can destroy 2 to 1000 and someone who can destroy 1001 to finite universe problem and staffs has to change 2-C and 2-B for tier 2 page with little advantage thats my stance here basically it helps for division and more clarification in the tier

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

Bump.

 

[GarrixianXD]

Okek, very nice

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

Bump.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

By that logic, the only difference between 7-B abd 7-A is how many Megatons your attack potency has, therefore, they shouldn't be separate tiers. It's done to prevent massive AP stomps, same as any other tiering.

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

By that logic, the only difference between 7-B abd 7-A is how many Megatons your attack potency has, therefore, they shouldn't be separate tiers. It's done to prevent massive AP stomps, same as any other tiering.

False analogy, 7-B and 7-A are different where one's a city and one's a mountain. 2-C and 2-B are the same thing with the only difference being the numbers.

 

[Greenshifter]

Changing 2-C to be 2 universes to anything non-countless and 2-B to be countless to anything non-infinite might work better?

 

[The_Wright_Way]

Fine. 6-A abd High 6-A. Literally the difference between one continent and lots of continents. Still different tiers. And, again, AP stomps. A 2-B can casually one-shot most 2-Cs. I don't see how splitting the tiers is an issue.

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

Fine. 6-A abd High 6-A. Literally the difference between one continent and lots of continents. Still different tiers. And, again, AP stomps. A 2-B can casually one-shot most 2-Cs. I don't see how splitting the tiers is an issue.

These analogies are a little off one since it's comparing Jules of energy to dimensional tiering.

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

Changing 2-C to be 2 universes to anything non-countless and 2-B to be countless to anything non-infinite might work better?

That actually sounds better yeah.

 

[LordWhis]

Except 2c and 2b isn't dimensional tiering.

A 2b is exactly 500.5 times as strong as a baseline 2c.

It's the same as joules... just think of them as 4d multiuniversal joules.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

These analogies are a little off one since it's comparing Jules of energy to dimensional tiering.

How is this in any way related to dimensional tiering.

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

Tier 2 isn't the beginning point to dimensional tiering? I thought it was.

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

Except 2c and 2b isn't dimensional tiering.

A 2b is exactly 500.5 times as strong as a baseline 2c.

It's the same as joules... just think of them as 4d multiuniversal joules.

We don't use Multipliers.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

Well, it kinda is. Technically tier 3 is with High 3-A. I just don't see what it has to do with 2-C and 2-B.

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

There is this article which if you scroll down the FAQ section, it mentions space being a hypershere large enough to contain at least 1,000 Hubble volumes, which is the same number as the distinction we make between 2-C and 2-B. I don't know if that's actually what the tiers are based off of, but that's all I could find.

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

Since it's not possible here to go from 2-C to 2-B with multipliers (even if the 2-C character is 1000 universes), then the numbers that decides the border between 2-C to 2-B are really arbitrary.