My Hero Academia: Star and Stripe Calc Issue

[Damage3245]

I suppose the original one

Okay thanks.

So from what I can tell, you are currently in favor of this one.

And Clover is currenlty in favor of this one.


For the record, would you say that the calcs assumptions of using 1300 meter for the thickness of the volume of clouds should be used even if there are other visuals that contradict that assumed value, and none that support it?

I know that for the sake of calcs we have to make assumptions for some variables, but I think that our assumptions can only carry us so far if contradicting evidence exists.

 

[Dalesean027]

Okay thanks.

So from what I can tell, you are currently in favor of this one.

And Clover is currenlty in favor of this one.


For the record, would you say that the calcs assumptions of using 1300 meter for the thickness of the volume of clouds should be used even if there are other visuals that contradict that assumed value, and none that support it?

Yes though the second one would be fine like I said if it wasn't trying to compromise by using the tiamut shot or that's contradicted by how the cloud dispersal looks in that same chapter, it's just too unreliable to it should just be the panel the feat happens in and honestly the thickness should just be pixel scaled from the first one

 

[Dalesean027]

Bump

 

[CloverDragon03]

I still prefer the second one (the one calced at 156.38 Gigatons) since it actually calculates the altitude of the clouds

 

[Dalesean027]

It uses flawed panels tho I'm for the original version I think that's the most consistent

 

[CloverDragon03]

It uses flawed panels tho I'm for the original version I think that's the most consistent

I don't mind using that one either

 

[Dalesean027]

I don't mind using that one either

Yeah I just pic thr og over that one cause it uses the tiamut shot panel and that's just outright contradicted and makes the feat appear smaller than the rest of the dispersal we see in the other panels just a few pages later or the actual shot the feat happens in. So just using the feat panel itself is best imo that's just my thoughts and reasoning tho

 

[Dalesean027]

@Therefir @Damage3245 @KingTempest
Are we fine with that clover seems to be okay with the original for the reasonings I gave over the last page

 

[KingTempest]

Yall be calling me like I'm CGM then I get no genuine nominations

You're asking if we're fine of Clover's opinions? I guess

 

[CloverDragon03]

@Therefir @Damage3245 @KingTempest
Are we fine with that clover seems to be okay with the original for the reasonings I gave over the last page

Bro KT ain't a CGM tho-

 

[Dalesean027]

Bro KT ain't a CGM tho-

Yeah but he gave input before so I felt he should also be pinged

My fault og was just tryna respect the mans opinion

 

[Therefir]

@Therefir @Damage3245 @KingTempest
Are we fine with that clover seems to be okay with the original for the reasonings I gave over the last page

I trust Clover's judgement, and while I personally prefer the 156.38 gigatons one, the original works fine considering using multiple panels might lead to inconsistencies.

 

[TheRustyOne]

Are we fine with that clover seems to be okay with the original for the reasonings I gave over the last page

Been awhile since I've last checked on this.

I'm not really sold on combining the scans of the hole from Chapter 331 and 332. The hole is obviously different in diameter and we cannot trust if the thickness/height didn't change as well. Just using the panel where the feat just happened and has the most detail seems to be the best option as of now.

So the original calc is alright by me.

 

[Dalesean027]

I'm not really sold on combining the scans of the hole from Chapter 331 and 332. The hole is obviously different in diameter and we cannot trust if the thickness/height didn't change as well. Just using the panel where the feat just happened and has the most detail seems to be the best option as of now.

So the original calc is alright by me.

Yup that's my stance as well so glad we're all seemingly on the same page

 

[CloverDragon03]

Okay so that makes 4 Calc Group Members who are in support of the original calc (as I mentioned I'm fine with using that as well)

 

[Arkenis]

Okay so that makes 4 Calc Group Members who are in support of the original calc (as I mentioned I'm fine with using that as well)

Not sure who calced the feats but what app was used?

 

[CloverDragon03]

Not sure who calced the feats but what app was used?

I don't wanna veer too off track from the thread but personally I use Paint.net (Therefir calced the feat tho and idk what he uses)

 

[Therefir]

Not sure who calced the feats but what app was used?

ImageMeter.

 

[Damage3245]

I'm not going to try to keep this thread open forever, so I will let the judgement of the original calc being fine stand and I'll only return to this topic if I discover some new evidence or find a new argument.