• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

MWI Question

Messages
361
Reaction score
187
If a verse follows Everett's MWI, which states something related to uncountably infinite dimensions, does the verse qualify for low 1-C
 
No. You don't scale a name. If the verse gets Low 1-C thanks to the descriptions used, it's Low 1-C. If it's not Low 1-C thanks to that, then the mention of MWI, or the usage of MWI, is irrelevant.
 
No. You don't scale a name. If the verse gets Low 1-C thanks to the descriptions used, it's Low 1-C. If it's not Low 1-C thanks to that, then the mention of MWI, or the usage of MWI, is irrelevant.
I see. So if a verse tells something that proves an uncountable infinite number of worlds/dimensions it is bare minimum low 1-C right, and higher if it has the higher dimensions like 8D, 9D etc.
 
I always had a doubt, 4D means spatial and temporal dimension right.
It doesn't have to be. If you can prove your universe has four spatial axes + time, then a single universe would be Low 1-C by default. The time dimension is basically a +1 dimension, almost always.
Then doesn’t every world have a 4D
Yeah, every fiction (beside some unique ones) is "out of need" at least 4D. Point is, there is a difference between a statement about "uncountably infinite High 3-A universes" and "uncountably infinite Low 2-C space-time continuums". The former would only be Low 2-C (without factoring the time dimension) while the latter would be Low 1-C.
 
It doesn't have to be. If you can prove your universe has four spatial axes + time, then a single universe would be Low 1-C by default. The time dimension is basically a +1 dimension, almost always.

Yeah, every fiction (beside some unique ones) is "out of need" at least 4D. Point is, there is a difference with a statement about "uncountably infinite High 3-A universes" and "uncountably infinite Low 2-C space-time continuums". The former would only be Low 2-C (without factoring the time dimension) while the latter would be Low 1-C.
Thank you. I have one final question. I’ve seen this thread online. Can I know what we think about it.
https://all-fiction-battles.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000104350
 
Thank you. I have one final question. I’ve seen this thread online. Can I know what we think about it.
https://all-fiction-battles.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000104350
I think it's shit and unless the author clearly indicates that they wanted uncountably infinite worlds inside their work, nothing outside the work should be used to scale it.

Works with everything btw, it's not because "platonic concept", "Ultimate Ensemble", "Type 4 Multiverse", "Kabbalah" etc are named that it should automatically scale. Heck, if it does scale due to the stuff explained within the work, the name holds no importance whatsoever.
 
I think it's shit and unless the author clearly indicates that they wanted uncountably infinite worlds inside their work, nothing outside the work should be used to scale it.
No like the thread is about MWI. Since real world theories are used for any form of tiering in vsbw, I wanted to try using MWI. I stumbled across this thread online. I wanted to know if the thread could be used by us or do I have to make a thread about this and get approval by the staff, probably the latter.
 
No like the thread is about MWI. Since real world theories are used for any form of tiering in vsbw, I wanted to try using MWI. I stumbled across this thread online. I wanted to know if the thread could be used by us or do I have to make a thread about this and get approval by the staff, probably the latter.
Almost certain it wouldn't be accepted. I don't understand the obsession with using stuff outside the work itself to scale, honestly.

It's not because the Tiering System based itself on IRL stuff that it automatically means that everything should be accepted as is.

If you wish to, go try your luck, but I think it's a meaningless endeavor.
 
Almost certain it wouldn't be accepted. I don't understand the obsession with using stuff outside the work itself to scale, honestly.

It's not because the Tiering System based itself on IRL stuff that it automatically means that everything should be accepted as is.

If you wish to, go try your luck, but I think it's a meaningless endeavor.
Just a try. Thanks for the info though.

Also, it’s not true that Stuff outside the work are used to scale, but instead theories are used for tiering system. If we get approval to use that theory for that scaling, then we have to prove that that theory exists for a verse.

I think the verse I’m working on right now might have the quantum MWI with Hilbert space as mentioned in the theory, I have a few scans to prove it. But unless the theory is accepted, it will probably just be classified as low 1-C at best because of uncountably infinite worlds.
 
Also, it’s not true that Stuff outside the work are used to scale, but instead theories are used for tiering system. If we get approval to use that theory for that scaling, then we have to prove that that theory exists for a verse.

I think the verse I’m working on right now might have the quantum MWI with Hilbert space as mentioned in the theory, I have a few scans to prove it. But unless the theory is accepted, it will probably just be classified as low 1-C at best because of uncountably infinite worlds.
If the descriptions are enough, it should scale regardless, you wouldn't even "need" to get approval for the theory itself, since the scale could stand on its own.

What you want to do is exactly what I said, you want to get a specific theory accepted, prove that "somehow" your verse has that theory and therefore put a Tier that would otherwise be invalid.
 
If the descriptions are enough, it should scale regardless, you wouldn't even "need" to get approval for the theory itself, since the scale could stand on its own.

What you want to do is exactly what I said, you want to get a specific theory accepted, prove that "somehow" your verse has that theory and therefore put a Tier that would otherwise be invalid.
I see. Thanks for the info about MWI and the others. I’ll probably not make a thread for the theory but the cosmology itself then. Thank you
 
Back
Top