Multiverse 6D? 5D? HELP

[ShionAH]

What rating would it be if there was a multiverse structure that was infinitely bigger than a smaller multiverse structure that contained infinite fifth dimensional universes?

 

[TaiwaneseScaler]

That'd be a 6th Dimensional Structure

 

[Fixxed]

In my view it was 6D

But if someone like DT come here, i think he will say it was 6D if it not talking about size alone but also about superiority

 

[ArcaneAbyss]

Still 5D, possibly 6D

multiverse containing infinite 5D universes is basically what a 2A multiverse is to a low2C universe, it doesn't give you an extra Axis

Your larger multiverse being infinitely larger is one of two things

1) 5D, if it is countable infinitely bigger, but will be countable infinitely above baseline (depends on how many times infinite it's above it)

2) 6D if it is uncountably infinitely bigger, eg, if the smaller multiverse exists in each passive moment in time within the larger multiverse time line, or a statement that satisfies qualitative superiority or proof of the smaller multiverse having irs own time axis separate from the larger one they contains it, etc

 

[Georredannea15]

It still makes 5-D. An infinite number of 5-Ds is mathematically no different from one 5-D.

As for being "infinitely greater", if there is no evidence that this term is used in the verse "in a mathematical sense" or "in the same logic as set theory", it would still be 5-D.

But if someone like DT come here, i think he will say it was 6D if it not talking about size alone but also about superiority

He stated that this term should be used in a mathematical sense. In the revision you opened

 

[Fixxed]

He stated that this term should be used in a mathematical sense. In the revision you opened

It is not as simple as "mathematical sense". In general you need superiority context for that