Multiversal Hax

[KaramcaS]

Character X erased Character Y.

When X did that, Y erased from every timeline + every independent parallel multiverse

what is this hax other then Existence Erasure

 

[Franstel]

Character X erased Character Y.

When X did that, Y erased from every timeline + every independent parallel multiverse

what is this hax other then Existence Erasure

That's 2A range

 

[TWILIGHT-OP]

Other than EE, it's Acausality Type 3 Negation

 

[Franstel]

Other than EE, it's Acausality Type 3 Negation

It's acausality type 3 negation in the same way atomic deconstruction would be Regeneration Negation (Mid-High) because the latter cannot allow you to regenerate from atoms.
Giving it power nulification is not the most accurate when the erasure does not really nullify type 3 Aca but just have such range that there's no other version of the character left to work with

 

[KaramcaS]

It's acausality type 3 negation in the same way atomic deconstruction would be Regeneration Negation (Mid-High) because the latter cannot allow you to regenerate from atoms.
Giving it power nulification is not the most accurate when the erasure does not really nullify type 3 Aca but just have such range that there's no other version of the character left to work with

I didnt understand that. from what I understand, Twilight says its aca3 neg, but you are saying that it is just 2-A range, is this correct?

 

[Mbpoops]

It could be both tbf

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

It could be both tbf

Eh, I mean I've always been a bit on the fence with the wiki's requirements for negating abilities, negation for abilities of this nature I've noticed tend to be about the cause rather than the effect. While having a 2A history EE would circumvent acaus 3, if your acaus 3 character hypothetically had versions of themselves existing in other realms that are spatiotemporally isolated from reality then said 2A history EE would not circumvent the acaus 3 (though tbf that would be a combination of more than just acaus and you could argue it is just a lack of range on the former's end) but you get the point. A much more blatant (and rather difficult) way to qualify for negation would be to remove the ability entirely without actually killing the character, though this is incredibly rare and seldom seen

 

[KaramcaS]

Multiverse Red
Multiverse Green
Multiverse Blue
Multiverse Purple
Multiverse Yellow


each of these multiverses does not have any connection, they are all independent from each other, but they are identical except for their different Histories. Each multiverse also has multiple small multiverses. Each small multiverse has infinite timelines.

in Multiverse Red, in a Small Multiverse, in a one timeline, Character X erases Character Y. Because of X's own "Beyond Logic" nature, Character Y erased from Every Timeline, Every Small multiverse, Every Multiverse. All of his versions are Gone.

 

[Zeldris98764]

Multiverse Red
Multiverse Green
Multiverse Blue
Multiverse Purple
Multiverse Yellow


each of these multiverses does not have any connection, they are all independent from each other, but they are identical except for their different Histories. Each multiverse also has multiple small multiverses. Each small multiverse has infinite timelines.

in Multiverse Red, in a Small Multiverse, in a one timeline, Character X erases Character Y. Because of X's own "Beyond Logic" nature, Character Y erased from Every Timeline, Every Small multiverse, Every Multiverse. All of his versions are Gone.

If Character X is strictly targeting Y and erasing only Y across all these disconnected realms from a single point of contact without actually destroying the multiverses themselves, I'd say it'd be:
1. EE
2 Range (Specifically 2-A Range, assuming there are an infinite number of these timelines/small multiverses involved, or whatever tier that specific cosmology warrants).

The fact that the erasure cascades to other independent multiverses just by striking one version of Y in one timeline also suggests the erasure might be targeting Y on a fundamental level (like their Concept or their Information Type 2). But mechanically, evaluating strictly what you've provided, it's just 2-A EE.