I've realized that this page treats a Big Bang as a "4-dimensional spatiotemporal expansion" and "that creates cosmoses from scratch". This is a complete misunderstanding of what a Big Bang is.
First of all, the terms 'expanding'/'growing'/'stretching'/etc. are NOT accurate terms to describe cosmological inflation. The use of these terms are oversimplifications of how these phenomena actually work, like saying that spacetime "bends" or that energy "rolls". Physicians prefer to use analogies instead of having to explain it mathematically, forwhy it's just easier.
Now, the inflation is not some "aftershock" of the Big Bang or a result of it, but the result of the inflaton field (a scalar-field property of vacuum energy).
To the second part, is a typical misconception. Nay, the megacosm did not started with a Big Bang. The Big-Bang model is a theoretical explanation of the earliest, heated, dense stages of the OBSERVABLE universe, with a special attention to the famous explosion AFTER the initial singularity that already was the observable universe (of uncertain origin, but the actual genesis of the Universe is most likely attributed to a previous macrocosm).
Then, what is a Big Bang, in general? Just an explosion originated from an extremely heated, dense, pointlike source, that can vary in energy. For making one, one doesn't need cosmic proportions of mass-energy. As incredible as it may sound, mankind has made small Big Bangs, thanks to particle colliders such as the LHC. So, it needs to be fixed.
First of all, the terms 'expanding'/'growing'/'stretching'/etc. are NOT accurate terms to describe cosmological inflation. The use of these terms are oversimplifications of how these phenomena actually work, like saying that spacetime "bends" or that energy "rolls". Physicians prefer to use analogies instead of having to explain it mathematically, forwhy it's just easier.
Now, the inflation is not some "aftershock" of the Big Bang or a result of it, but the result of the inflaton field (a scalar-field property of vacuum energy).
To the second part, is a typical misconception. Nay, the megacosm did not started with a Big Bang. The Big-Bang model is a theoretical explanation of the earliest, heated, dense stages of the OBSERVABLE universe, with a special attention to the famous explosion AFTER the initial singularity that already was the observable universe (of uncertain origin, but the actual genesis of the Universe is most likely attributed to a previous macrocosm).
Then, what is a Big Bang, in general? Just an explosion originated from an extremely heated, dense, pointlike source, that can vary in energy. For making one, one doesn't need cosmic proportions of mass-energy. As incredible as it may sound, mankind has made small Big Bangs, thanks to particle colliders such as the LHC. So, it needs to be fixed.